Mister Scratch wrote:The irony here is that you demand that people read the entire, lengthy Mitton/James article, without proffering any commentary of your own, and yet you cannot be bothered to read this ZLMB thread. Hmmm.....
No irony.
You've made claims about the entire Mitton and James article, so I've invited people, if they're interested, to test your claims against the entire Mitton and James article.
You've also made claims about that entire 28-page thread. I have nothing against anybody reading through it who cares to do so. And, if you would like me to, I'll even tell them that, if they're interested, they can test your claims against the original thread:
If you're interested in testing Scratch One's claims about that thread, feel free to read it through.
There. Satisfied?
(I didn't think so.)