Zoidberg wrote: Sure she does. She has just temporarily suspended the notion.Zoidberg wrote:Unless you meant to say that there are members of the Church of the devil among those who are officially LDS.charity wrote:I think there probably are. There are some people who are apostate and operating under the radar. Wolves in sheep's clothing.
Now let's wait for charity to come in and say something to the effect of "That's not what I said".
I said exactly that, and I meant it. You probably didn't read my post just a few earlier in those topioc. Cross posting.
It isn't the level of activity, or inactivity that is the determining issue. It is the "trying to destroy another person's faith" that determines what makes a wolf. Look at what "a wolf in sheep's clohting" means. The wolf put on a sheep's fleece so he could sneak into the flock and more easily kill the trusting sheep who had accepted him into the flock. The wolf is deliberately planning to kill sheep. He gains access to a lot of sheep by pretending to be one of them. Those are all deceitful, willful actions.
Simply being a member with a less than firm testimony, or even no testimony at all, doesn't put one in that situation. Intent, people, INTENT.