KimberlyAnn wrote:
LifeOnaPlate, if you're not careful, you may get your ass handed to you on a plate.
KA
Would LOAP then become AOAP?
KimberlyAnn wrote:Now, I've taken a hit to my credibility, LOaP? For having the personal experience of being one of hundreds of girls at YW camp? We typically had over two hundred girls attend.
How many YW's camps have you attended?
Your credibility is the one taking the hits.
LifeOnaPlate, if you're not careful, you may get your ass handed to you on a plate.
KA
SatanWasSetUp wrote:KimberlyAnn wrote:LOaP, how can you say over on MAD that the types of object lessons described on this thread are not commonplace? They are. They are widespread. How can you deny it?
KA
Not only were these lessons taught, they still are. All they are is analogies, and Mormons love analogies. I recently attended a baptism, and one the lessons was an object lesson using a glass of water with food coloring representing sin, then the presenter put in some bleach to make the water pure again, just like baptism. Anyone who denies Mormons use objects to better present their analogies never went to church. In fact, it is a common teaching method used by non-mormons too. Nothing surprising here.
silentkid wrote:KimberlyAnn wrote:
LifeOnaPlate, if you're not careful, you may get your ass handed to you on a plate.
KA
Would LOAP then become AOAP?
LifeOnaPlate wrote:KimberlyAnn wrote:Now, I've taken a hit to my credibility, LOaP? For having the personal experience of being one of hundreds of girls at YW camp? We typically had over two hundred girls attend.
How many YW's camps have you attended?
Your credibility is the one taking the hits.
LifeOnaPlate, if you're not careful, you may get your ass handed to you on a plate.
KA
Yikes, this cat has claws!
;)
My point in calling out your misrepresentations isn't to make you the fool, but to demonstrate how people have a tendency to stack the deck a little sometimes.
KimberlyAnn wrote:LifeOnaPlate wrote:KimberlyAnn wrote:Now, I've taken a hit to my credibility, LOaP? For having the personal experience of being one of hundreds of girls at YW camp? We typically had over two hundred girls attend.
How many YW's camps have you attended?
Your credibility is the one taking the hits.
LifeOnaPlate, if you're not careful, you may get your ass handed to you on a plate.
KA
Yikes, this cat has claws!
;)
My point in calling out your misrepresentations isn't to make you the fool, but to demonstrate how people have a tendency to stack the deck a little sometimes.
They weren't "misrepresentations". Misrepresentations usually involve a deliberate intention to deceive, and I most certainly did not do that, LOaP. You are the one now misrepresenting me, because I believe you are doing it to gain an advantage or the upper hand. I do not appreciate it nor do I take it lightly.
You haven't begun to see the claws.
If I had used the correct "peppermint" analogy, instead of the salad analogy, the number of examples I used on the MAD post would have been the same. Stacking the deck? Hardly!
Pfft!
KA
Zoidberg wrote:My husband is under 30, and he got the touched gum lesson. Sure enough, the gum represented girls, just like KA's essay said.
I was a YW for a short while since I'm a convert, but never got any lessons like that. Must be a Utah thing.
I think it's disgusting, and the natural question arises why this gum/cupcake/donut/cake never represents males. Has anyone ever had an expereience where it did?
LifeOnaPlate wrote:KimberlyAnn wrote:LOaP, how can you say over on MAD that the types of object lessons described on this thread are not commonplace? They are. They are widespread. How can you deny it?
KA
So far we have Liz, you, Alter Idem, silentkid (his sister, apparently), mishmagnet, and truth dancer alluded to it. That is 6 people. Presume there were about 30 people involved in each lesson, we have a few hundred unfortunate souls who were subjected to this ridiculous object lesson. (At least people got cupcakes, right? Who are the cheap fools using a single piece of candy?)
I believe this type of object lesson is spread (likely through Utah, largely,) and sincerely doubt it is taught to anything near half the membership of the Church. Since it isn't in any manuals I can gratefully say this object lesson is not sanctioned by the Church, though teachers (even some with good intentions) subjected people to the nonsense. ANY time this is enacted it is a disgrace. I don't see it as "commonplace," which to me would indicate more than a few people, or even a few hundred.