Ray A: The Gandhi of Internet Mormonism?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Post by _Gadianton »

What I'd really like to see, when Ray has the time, is any comment by myself, Beastie, Scratch, Shades, PP, Rollo, Guy, Joe Schmoe, Mercury, Infamous, or any "usual" "anti-Mormons" on this board who have made violence-laden comments or jokes on par with this bit from Ray:

Q: What is the difference between a dead dog in the road and a dead anti-Mormon in the road?
A: There are skid marks in front of the dog.


yeah, it's a "lawyer joke" rip off, but it's pretty bad considering Ray has specifically called Beastie and others here "anti-Mormons" and it's in the context of heated debates. Honestly, I'm near 100% certain none on the list I put up above would make that joke about Mormons. And I'm 99% sure none of them would make it about apologists who they debate with.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Gadianton wrote:What I'd really like to see, when Ray has the time, is any comment by myself, Beastie, Scratch, Shades, PP, Rollo, Guy, Joe Schmoe, Mercury, Infamous, or any "usual" "anti-Mormons" on this board who have made violence-laden comments or jokes on par with this bit from Ray:

Q: What is the difference between a dead dog in the road and a dead anti-Mormon in the road?
A: There are skid marks in front of the dog.


yeah, it's a "lawyer joke" rip off, but it's pretty bad considering Ray has specifically called Beastie and others here "anti-Mormons" and it's in the context of heated debates. Honestly, I'm near 100% certain none on the list I put up above would make that joke about Mormons. And I'm 99% sure none of them would make it about apologists who they debate with.


I posted that originally on my blog, as a lawyer joke, and altered it for this board. They have a sense of humour, you obviously don't. So, from that, you deduct I want anti-Mormons dead.

This is really getting ridiculous.
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Post by _Gadianton »

Ray A wrote:
Gadianton wrote:What I'd really like to see, when Ray has the time, is any comment by myself, Beastie, Scratch, Shades, PP, Rollo, Guy, Joe Schmoe, Mercury, Infamous, or any "usual" "anti-Mormons" on this board who have made violence-laden comments or jokes on par with this bit from Ray:

Q: What is the difference between a dead dog in the road and a dead anti-Mormon in the road?
A: There are skid marks in front of the dog.


yeah, it's a "lawyer joke" rip off, but it's pretty bad considering Ray has specifically called Beastie and others here "anti-Mormons" and it's in the context of heated debates. Honestly, I'm near 100% certain none on the list I put up above would make that joke about Mormons. And I'm 99% sure none of them would make it about apologists who they debate with.


I posted that originally on my blog, as a lawyer joke, and altered it for this board. They have a sense of humour, you obviously don't. So, from that, you deduct I want anti-Mormons dead.

This is really getting ridiculous.


Oh no no no. I don't think you want anti-Mormons dead or want to cause harm to them. It's just pushing the lines to joke about it. In the context of heated discussions it's really pushing the lines. And I don't see any anti-Mormons here pushing those same boundaries. A lot of people with bigoted attitudes would feel comfortable substituting "Mormon", "Jew", "black", "Gay" for "Lawyer" in your joke, think it's funny and everyone should have a sense of humor, and have no intention of carrying out or hoping for real harm to come across their target. But its humor that pushes the envelope in ways I don't see any critics on this board doing with Mormons. If any of my bro's here made that joke, I'd be sending a fast PM and advising them to be careful and think about what they're doing.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_aussieguy55
_Emeritus
Posts: 2122
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:22 pm

Please!!!!!

Post by _aussieguy55 »

Please no more threads on what RayA or DCP said etc. Its getting boring. Please more of Beastie's and Kevin's substantive comment on the Book of Mormon and Book of Abraham. I come here for balance as the Mormon critics here do not get booted when they start to rattle the cage of the TBMs like they do on the other board.
Hilary Clinton " I won the places that represent two-thirds of America's GDP.I won in places are optimistic diverse, dynamic, moving forward"
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Daniel,

I'm sure you've convinced yourself with your own explanation for why you don't find Ray's threats "fascinating". Personally, I find this statement of yours from the same above linked thread to provide some insight:

Three or four times, after returning from month-long trips off the continent during which I've been completely without computer access, having posted and published nothing during the interim, I've returned and, out of curiosity, done a search on the oddly-named "Recovery" board for my name. Invariably, without exception, there have been at least a couple of dozen posts during my absence discussing my insanity, my obscene obesity, my sexual perversity, my dishonesty, my viciousness, my lack of ethics, my pathetic writing skills, and/or my incompetence as a scholar. I don't have to do anything to inspire such outbursts.


People on RFM, as far as I've seen, don't go around threatening Mormons. The worst you could find, in that regard, was a "time travel" post about killing Joseph Smith. Yes, they make fun of Mormons, and they especially make fun of you. I think that is what fascinates you, not that it's really some incubation for future nazi mass murderers, as much as you insinuate on the same thread. Because if it were really the fact that it's incubating future mass murderers that fascinates you, minds like Ray's should be more fascinating than people making fun of you.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Gadianton wrote:What I'd really like to see, when Ray has the time, is any comment by myself, Beastie, Scratch, Shades, PP, Rollo, Guy, Joe Schmoe, Mercury, Infamous, or any "usual" "anti-Mormons" on this board who have made violence-laden comments or jokes on par with this bit from Ray:


Don't worry Gad, it will be my pleasure to do some "hunting" - later. I'll have some zingers for you. Rollo is possibly the most balanced, and it will be hard to fault him in this regard, as it will be to fault Shades. Beastie shouldn't have gone off her rocker at Bob. You made a mistake to include PP, Schmo, Scratch, Mercury, and "Infamous" (Infymus).

Just shows how blind you are to a fault in your comrades. I am no more, nor no less, "Internet" volatile than any of them. Scratch has been yelling obscenities for ages, but he's only now "coming out" because he got roasted in his lying tracks. Remember? I'm a "deranged prick". And do I really have to go over, again!, what he said about Dan Peterson? This has been posted multiple times! yet you still don't see how offensive it is.
_mocnarf
_Emeritus
Posts: 304
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 6:11 pm

Post by _mocnarf »

Daniel Peterson wrote:If your list of my alleged crimes were even partially accurate, Scratch, I would, plainly, be the shameless monster of unethical behavior that you obviously wish to portray me as being.

Happily, it's wrong altogether and in every particular.

By contrast, while, in and of itself, your likely alteration of a personal message (so strikingly similar to your apparent earlier behavior) doesn't precisely make you a monster, it does seem to point (once again) to your being both malicious and deliberately dishonest.

Malevolent mendacity. The pattern doesn't vary. The leopard doesn't change its spots.


Boy, Bishop Dan,
You got that right!


Having you been looking in the mirror?
Aim at at nothing and you're sure to hit it.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Gadianton wrote: If any of my bro's here made that joke, I'd be sending a fast PM and advising them to be careful and think about what they're doing.


Oh Gad, get off your self-righteous, blinkered high horse. You should have been doing this ages ago!
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

beastie wrote:And, by the way, based on Ray's emotional volatility expressed on this board, I feel safe assuming the only thing that's changed about him are his loyalties.


And that bugs the hell out of you.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Ray,

Let me help you focus on what you're ignoring in gad's challenge:

What I'd really like to see, when Ray has the time, is any comment by myself, Beastie, Scratch, Shades, PP, Rollo, Guy, Joe Schmoe, Mercury, Infamous, or any "usual" "anti-Mormons" on this board who have made violence-laden comments or jokes on par with this bit from Ray:
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
Post Reply