Smilies???

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Imwashingmypirate wrote:Why don't you like the smilies Shades?


I explain in this post.

Reasons 1 and 2 are accomplished quite well here without "smilies."
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

Shades,

Are you censoring us?
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

CaliforniaKid wrote:Shades,

Are you censoring us?


No. You may use smilies all you like. They'll just show up as text instead of those idiotic circular graphics.

Doctor Steuss wrote:Reasons 1 and 2 are accomplished quite well here without "smilies."


Which makes smilies that much less necessary.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Post by _Scottie »

I hereby rescind my praise to the man....

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TO SHADES!!!!!!!!!!!!
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Doctor Steuss wrote:Reasons 1 and 2 are accomplished quite well here without "smilies."


Which makes smilies that much less necessary.

Word.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Post by _moksha »

You run across many unusual things in life, including the existence of smilie curmudgeons. Instead of an absolute prohibition against smilies, why not put Liz and Bond on smilie patrol? Have them hand out excessive smilie citations. Too many citations and you could send the offenders to Wade for analysis.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Yoda

Post by _Yoda »

moksha wrote:You run across many unusual things in life, including the existence of smilie curmudgeons. Instead of an absolute prohibition against smilies, why not put Liz and Bond on smilie patrol? Have them hand out excessive smilie citations. Too many citations and you could send the offenders to Wade for analysis.


Since, according to Shades, I was an offender of overusing smiles, I suppose it would be Bond that would have to be on patrol. :(
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

CaliforniaKid wrote:Shades,

Are you censoring us?


Like Shades could sensor the flying spaghetti monster.

Image
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
Post Reply