No. You may use smilies all you like. They'll just show up as text instead of those idiotic circular graphics.
Doctor Steuss wrote:Reasons 1 and 2 are accomplished quite well here without "smilies."
Which makes smilies that much less necessary.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
You run across many unusual things in life, including the existence of smilie curmudgeons. Instead of an absolute prohibition against smilies, why not put Liz and Bond on smilie patrol? Have them hand out excessive smilie citations. Too many citations and you could send the offenders to Wade for analysis.
moksha wrote:You run across many unusual things in life, including the existence of smilie curmudgeons. Instead of an absolute prohibition against smilies, why not put Liz and Bond on smilie patrol? Have them hand out excessive smilie citations. Too many citations and you could send the offenders to Wade for analysis.
Since, according to Shades, I was an offender of overusing smiles, I suppose it would be Bond that would have to be on patrol. :(
Like Shades could sensor the flying spaghetti monster.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07