Jason Bourne wrote:Like I said the institute program where I live is barely breathing. And FYI, the only requirement I even put on my kids is that the attend a school that had an institute program of at least a few hundred kids. I wanted them to have access to that for their social life.
That's my point, Jason. The Institute program where you live
wouldn't be barely breathing,
if BYU didn't exist.
If BYU didn't exist, your Institute program would be strong and vital, if kids from families like yours didn't have the tithing-subsidized option of BYU.
Would you send your kids to BYU, if you had to foot the entire bill? If there was no subsidy for members?
I thought I trusted them fine. Two wanted to go to BYU, one was iffy. Oh and by the way, BYU did not keep two active at all.
Then not only was it a sad waste of tithing money, but it didn't live up its reputation.
My son go the boot from BYUI after being there two weeks. He got caught smoking pot. So for my boy, I regret the pressure I did put on him to go to BYUI. He joined the Marines shortly thereafter.
Hindsight is always better than foresight. Parents don't have a crystal ball, and BYU isn't a magical place guarenteed to turn a wayward kid around.
My other daughter went on a study abroad with BYU, met an inactive LDS boy in Brazil, quit school, moved to Brazil, moved in with the dude and recently after a year and a half of shaking up got married.
All that tithing gone, and nothing to show for it.
My oldest loved BYU and met her hubby there.
At least she has a husband to show for the expense of tithing.
My youngest still has 6 year til college. So did I trust my kids? Maybe not enough. Did two of them follow the path I had hoped they would. Nope. Not at BYU either.
Parenting is a crap shoot. We win some, we lose some. But I see no reason to subsidize an LDS education to the tune of millions of dollars in tithing.
Yes some places it is. Not where I live.
We have a program in this state where high school students who qualify can attend a community college for their junior and senior year, earning high school credit for the classes they take at the college. Any student is eligible as long as they pass the test and can get to the colleges classes. They earn an AA in the same time frame they graduate from high school. It's a very cool program for many elite kids. On the other hand, many top students desert their high schools, taking with them their example and their leadership, leaving the kids left behind with examples of poor leadership and generally bad examples. That reason alone was why I refused to allow my kids to participate in the community college program. They could have passed the test and we could have provided them with transportation (even though it would have been a huge burden), but what about all those other kids, the ones left behind? The ones who weren't quite smart enough, who didn't have the means to get transportation to the college, whose parents didn't understand the need for a college education?
I see Institute in much the same way. My kids were a huge asset to their colleges Institute programs. They met their mates there, made lifelong friendships, learned from the Institute classes, strengthened their testimonies because the environment in which they lived wasn't pristine. Without lots of kids like mine, Institute becomes what it is where you live, where everyone who can afford it sends their kids to Utah.
No I really think BYU is a good deal but I would favor increasing the tuition.
It isn't a good deal, for the kids in the Institute close to where you live.