Black men and the Pre-Existence

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Ren
_Emeritus
Posts: 1387
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:34 am

Post by _Ren »

I don't remember it being mentioned 'that' much, but it was certainly mentioned. And I believed it.
It seemed a decent justification to me -at the time. It felt better than just saying 'just cos', and it didn't exactly feel natural to 'really' judge anybody for what they did before they were born...! (In any solid sense...)
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

I think Bruce R. McConkie said that all those prophets and apostles who speculated on "the negro" spoke with a limited light and knowledge and we should just disregard what they said. Of course every non-mormon and exmormon already knows that they speak with a limited light and knowledge, and we always disregard what they say.
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: Black men and the Pre-Existence

Post by _Jason Bourne »


Liz,

It really doesn't matter whether either you or any TBM believes it or not. Brigham Young said it. According to history, it was the mind and will of the Lord.



Could you clarify the comment "According to history, it was the mind and will of the Lord."
_the road to hana
_Emeritus
Posts: 1485
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:35 pm

Post by _the road to hana »

Yes, we were taught this from childhood. I remember hearing it again in Seminary. I remember hearing it again at BYU.

Of course we were told that lots of people were less valiant in the pre-existence, accounting for their various difficulties. We were also taught that those of us who were LDS were, of course, more valiant.
The road is beautiful, treacherous, and full of twists and turns.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Before the lifting of the ban in 1978 I recall comments about pre-existence issues and being born black. Black's were considered to have been less valient and fence sitters. However, I understood these to be more speculative than solid doctrine. On the other hand I have since seen a FP statement that essentially sayd this and this seems fairly official.
_Who Knows
_Emeritus
Posts: 2455
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm

Post by _Who Knows »

Of course we were taught this.

I was also taught that those who were born into good Mormon families were the most valiant in the preexistence. I was also taught that people born with disabilities were not so valiant in the pre-existance. It was like a sliding scale. The less valiant you were, the worse your life sucked here on earth. But you were willing to accept a sucky life, just for the opportunity to gain a body.
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

Absolutely I was taught this... as truth revealed to God's prophet. I still have a few books written by LDS authors explaining the teaching/doctrine.

I was raised in a family that did not hold to racists ideas hence could not ever believe such a thing.

I was taught that the reason I could not embrace this teaching was because I was too hard hearted, or not humble enough to have God confirm the truth of it. You know... "God's ways are not man's ways." And, "The truth will be confirmed AFTER the trial of your faith," etc. etc. etc.

It caused much distress for me during my believing days when this teaching was considered doctrine/truth.

Funny how prophets think they are inspired....


~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_RAJ
_Emeritus
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:26 pm

Post by _RAJ »

So do faithful members still believe some version of this? That is, your particular circumstance / disability / challenge, etc... is correlated in some way to your behavior in "the pre-existence."
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

Hi RAJ,

So do faithful members still believe some version of this? That is, your particular circumstance / disability / challenge, etc... is correlated in some way to your behavior in "the pre-existence."


I have never heard any prophet or leader of the church suggest that the above teaching was/is erroneous.

Leaders may say "it is in the past", or we do not have to abide by those teachings, or God has seen fit to release the ban, etc. etc. but I have yet to hear even one leader suggest it was not truth.

My observation is that most apologists will support the teaching, and dismiss it as something in the past but few would suggest the prophets got it wrong.

~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Black men and the Pre-Existence

Post by _Dr. Shades »

liz3564 wrote:
Boaz wrote:Black men were not valiant in the pre-existence..


First of all, this was something I had never heard of until many years later when I read Brigham Young's comments concerning this in the Journal of Discourses.

I personally do not know of any members who believe this, and I have some very prominent members of the Church in my family.


I find both of those propositions extremely hard to believe. Of course we were all taught those things, repeatedly. It was always given as the reason blacks were denied the priesthood whenever anyone asked about it.

Why did you think that blacks were denied the priesthood?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Post Reply