Black men and the Pre-Existence
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 11:34 am
I don't remember it being mentioned 'that' much, but it was certainly mentioned. And I believed it.
It seemed a decent justification to me -at the time. It felt better than just saying 'just cos', and it didn't exactly feel natural to 'really' judge anybody for what they did before they were born...! (In any solid sense...)
It seemed a decent justification to me -at the time. It felt better than just saying 'just cos', and it didn't exactly feel natural to 'really' judge anybody for what they did before they were born...! (In any solid sense...)
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1183
- Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm
I think Bruce R. McConkie said that all those prophets and apostles who speculated on "the negro" spoke with a limited light and knowledge and we should just disregard what they said. Of course every non-mormon and exmormon already knows that they speak with a limited light and knowledge, and we always disregard what they say.
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley
"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9207
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm
Re: Black men and the Pre-Existence
Liz,
It really doesn't matter whether either you or any TBM believes it or not. Brigham Young said it. According to history, it was the mind and will of the Lord.
Could you clarify the comment "According to history, it was the mind and will of the Lord."
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1485
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 4:35 pm
Yes, we were taught this from childhood. I remember hearing it again in Seminary. I remember hearing it again at BYU.
Of course we were told that lots of people were less valiant in the pre-existence, accounting for their various difficulties. We were also taught that those of us who were LDS were, of course, more valiant.
Of course we were told that lots of people were less valiant in the pre-existence, accounting for their various difficulties. We were also taught that those of us who were LDS were, of course, more valiant.
The road is beautiful, treacherous, and full of twists and turns.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 9207
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm
Before the lifting of the ban in 1978 I recall comments about pre-existence issues and being born black. Black's were considered to have been less valient and fence sitters. However, I understood these to be more speculative than solid doctrine. On the other hand I have since seen a FP statement that essentially sayd this and this seems fairly official.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 2455
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm
Of course we were taught this.
I was also taught that those who were born into good Mormon families were the most valiant in the preexistence. I was also taught that people born with disabilities were not so valiant in the pre-existance. It was like a sliding scale. The less valiant you were, the worse your life sucked here on earth. But you were willing to accept a sucky life, just for the opportunity to gain a body.
I was also taught that those who were born into good Mormon families were the most valiant in the preexistence. I was also taught that people born with disabilities were not so valiant in the pre-existance. It was like a sliding scale. The less valiant you were, the worse your life sucked here on earth. But you were willing to accept a sucky life, just for the opportunity to gain a body.
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4792
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm
Absolutely I was taught this... as truth revealed to God's prophet. I still have a few books written by LDS authors explaining the teaching/doctrine.
I was raised in a family that did not hold to racists ideas hence could not ever believe such a thing.
I was taught that the reason I could not embrace this teaching was because I was too hard hearted, or not humble enough to have God confirm the truth of it. You know... "God's ways are not man's ways." And, "The truth will be confirmed AFTER the trial of your faith," etc. etc. etc.
It caused much distress for me during my believing days when this teaching was considered doctrine/truth.
Funny how prophets think they are inspired....
~dancer~
I was raised in a family that did not hold to racists ideas hence could not ever believe such a thing.
I was taught that the reason I could not embrace this teaching was because I was too hard hearted, or not humble enough to have God confirm the truth of it. You know... "God's ways are not man's ways." And, "The truth will be confirmed AFTER the trial of your faith," etc. etc. etc.
It caused much distress for me during my believing days when this teaching was considered doctrine/truth.
Funny how prophets think they are inspired....
~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4792
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm
Hi RAJ,
I have never heard any prophet or leader of the church suggest that the above teaching was/is erroneous.
Leaders may say "it is in the past", or we do not have to abide by those teachings, or God has seen fit to release the ban, etc. etc. but I have yet to hear even one leader suggest it was not truth.
My observation is that most apologists will support the teaching, and dismiss it as something in the past but few would suggest the prophets got it wrong.
~dancer~
So do faithful members still believe some version of this? That is, your particular circumstance / disability / challenge, etc... is correlated in some way to your behavior in "the pre-existence."
I have never heard any prophet or leader of the church suggest that the above teaching was/is erroneous.
Leaders may say "it is in the past", or we do not have to abide by those teachings, or God has seen fit to release the ban, etc. etc. but I have yet to hear even one leader suggest it was not truth.
My observation is that most apologists will support the teaching, and dismiss it as something in the past but few would suggest the prophets got it wrong.
~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14117
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm
Re: Black men and the Pre-Existence
liz3564 wrote:Boaz wrote:Black men were not valiant in the pre-existence..
First of all, this was something I had never heard of until many years later when I read Brigham Young's comments concerning this in the Journal of Discourses.
I personally do not know of any members who believe this, and I have some very prominent members of the Church in my family.
I find both of those propositions extremely hard to believe. Of course we were all taught those things, repeatedly. It was always given as the reason blacks were denied the priesthood whenever anyone asked about it.
Why did you think that blacks were denied the priesthood?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
--Louis Midgley
--Louis Midgley