Church Surveillance

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Coggins7 wrote:Keep laughing Scratch. Once you are outed--and eventually you will be--for who and what you are, this entire pretense will end and we will all be able to move on, because, as will be so painfully evident at that time, there will be nothing to see here.


LOL!!!

Gee, who and what *am* I, I wonder? A leftist? An apostate? A member of the 5th Column? An embittered LDS woman? Probably, to people like Coggins, it doesn't really matter, so long as it can be spun into some kind of character assassination.
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

Gee, who and what *am* I, I wonder? A leftist? An apostate? A member of the 5th Column? An embittered LDS woman? Probably, to people like Coggins, it doesn't really matter, so long as it can be spun into some kind of character assassination.


For all I know, your a Gay transsexual midget hooker aromatherapist with rickets. I really don't know because you eep your actual identity so well hidden.

Why is that Scratch?
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.


- Thomas S. Monson
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

Not quite what I've said.



rc said the following with regard to both the communist and homosexual flaps at BYU:



I am intimately familiar with this, having a grandfather involved and several professors I have personally interviewed. The "Church" was involved only to the extent it squelched it once it figured out what was going on. My grandfather was the designated squelcher. You're just wrong.



As to the BYU spying case, it is fairly well discussed elsewhere. I particularly found Gregory Prince's work on David O McKay a compelling read on the subject, naming names. The spy ring was instigated by students. Pres. Wilkinson (who denies commissioning it in his edited multivolume history of BYU) with a wink and a nod apparently listened to its results. When Wilkinson pressured the seven profs to resign, they appealed to my grandfather who took the matter to the Board of Trustees, which then understood what was going on and offered to reinstate the profs. Not all accepted the offer. One, accused by the students of being disloyal to the Church, not attending meetings and being a communist, went on to be a Reagan kitchen cabinet member and then a General Authority.


According to the affected professors I've interviewed, at least three of whom are still angry over the incident, they see it as students doing the spying on professors and Wilkinson taking unfair advantage of it. That isn't the Church, and the Church righted that ship. As far as entrapment of homosexuals, BYU Security in the 1970s (as well as today) are commissioned peace officers in Utah. They are as legitimate a police force as the Provo P.D. At the same time this was going on, the Utah County Sheriff's Department was arresting homosexuals with undercover agents at rest stops on the freeway, a practice that continues in almost all states. When Oaks learned what was going on, he put a stop to it.


If I overstated your case, sorry. What I see here is that you say "the Church righted the ship" regarding the BYU "spy ring" and that BYU security, in moving open homosexuals out of the campus, were doing nothing peculiar for the times. In both cases, the Church itself seems to have had nothing to do directly with either case. There is, of course, no evidence of any such things occurring today.

Scratch still stands exposed as an intellectual hack here, as seems his wont in most cases.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.


- Thomas S. Monson
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Coggins7 wrote:
Not quite what I've said.



rc said the following with regard to both the communist and homosexual flaps at BYU:

I am intimately familiar with this, having a grandfather involved and several professors I have personally interviewed. The "Church" was involved only to the extent it squelched it once it figured out what was going on. My grandfather was the designated squelcher. You're just wrong.


No; not to "both." Bob later tried to score a point over the use of the term "spy ring." He insisted quite strenuously that it referred only to the anti-liberal "purge."

As to the BYU spying case, it is fairly well discussed elsewhere. I particularly found Gregory Prince's work on David O McKay a compelling read on the subject, naming names. The spy ring was instigated by students. Pres. Wilkinson (who denies commissioning it in his edited multivolume history of BYU) with a wink and a nod apparently listened to its results. When Wilkinson pressured the seven profs to resign, they appealed to my grandfather who took the matter to the Board of Trustees, which then understood what was going on and offered to reinstate the profs. Not all accepted the offer. One, accused by the students of being disloyal to the Church, not attending meetings and being a communist, went on to be a Reagan kitchen cabinet member and then a General Authority.


According to the affected professors I've interviewed, at least three of whom are still angry over the incident, they see it as students doing the spying on professors and Wilkinson taking unfair advantage of it. That isn't the Church, and the Church righted that ship. As far as entrapment of homosexuals, BYU Security in the 1970s (as well as today) are commissioned peace officers in Utah. They are as legitimate a police force as the Provo P.D. At the same time this was going on, the Utah County Sheriff's Department was arresting homosexuals with undercover agents at rest stops on the freeway, a practice that continues in almost all states. When Oaks learned what was going on, he put a stop to it.


If I overstated your case, sorry. What I see here is that you say "the Church righted the ship" regarding the BYU "spy ring" and that BYU security, in moving open homosexuals out of the campus, were doing nothing peculiar for the times. In both cases, the Church itself seems to have had nothing to do directly with either case. There is, of course, no evidence of any such things occurring today.

Scratch still stands exposed as an intellectual hack here, as seems his wont in most cases.


It is a huge leap to claim that "the Church" had nothing to do with the spying. In fact, after these various incidents, the Church's surveillance and spying activities were consolidated in the SCMC. The Church is, and has long been, interested in spying on dissidents.
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

rc said the following with regard to both the communist and homosexual flaps at BYU:

Quote:
I am intimately familiar with this, having a grandfather involved and several professors I have personally interviewed. The "Church" was involved only to the extent it squelched it once it figured out what was going on. My grandfather was the designated squelcher. You're just wrong.



No; not to "both." Bob later tried to score a point over the use of the term "spy ring." He insisted quite strenuously that it referred only to the anti-liberal "purge."



No, not to both my mendacious friend. I said "both" and then posted three paragraphs of text in which rc deals with both the homosexual and communist spy ring question. That you could not parse this intelligently is your own problem, not mine. The first paragraph has to do with, obviously, only one of those situations.


rc:

As to the BYU spying case, it is fairly well discussed elsewhere. I particularly found Gregory Prince's work on David O McKay a compelling read on the subject, naming names. The spy ring was instigated by students. Pres. Wilkinson (who denies commissioning it in his edited multivolume history of BYU) with a wink and a nod apparently listened to its results. When Wilkinson pressured the seven profs to resign, they appealed to my grandfather who took the matter to the Board of Trustees, which then understood what was going on and offered to reinstate the profs. Not all accepted the offer. One, accused by the students of being disloyal to the Church, not attending meetings and being a communist, went on to be a Reagan kitchen cabinet member and then a General Authority.



Quote:
According to the affected professors I've interviewed, at least three of whom are still angry over the incident, they see it as students doing the spying on professors and Wilkinson taking unfair advantage of it. That isn't the Church, and the Church righted that ship. As far as entrapment of homosexuals, BYU Security in the 1970s (as well as today) are commissioned peace officers in Utah. They are as legitimate a police force as the Provo P.D. At the same time this was going on, the Utah County Sheriff's Department was arresting homosexuals with undercover agents at rest stops on the freeway, a practice that continues in almost all states. When Oaks learned what was going on, he put a stop to it.


Coggins:

If I overstated your case, sorry. What I see here is that you say "the Church righted the ship" regarding the BYU "spy ring" and that BYU security, in moving open homosexuals out of the campus, were doing nothing peculiar for the times. In both cases, the Church itself seems to have had nothing to do directly with either case. There is, of course, no evidence of any such things occurring today.

Scratch still stands exposed as an intellectual hack here, as seems his wont in most cases.


Forrest Scratch:

It is a huge leap to claim that "the Church" had nothing to do with the spying. In fact, after these various incidents, the Church's surveillance and spying activities were consolidated in the SCMC. The Church is, and has long been, interested in spying on dissidents.


When you can come up with a single, bare shred of evidence to this end, let us all know. Until then, I'm going to send you a year's supply of tin foil, as I'm sure you'll be needing it in ever increasing quantities as time moves forward.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.


- Thomas S. Monson
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Coggins7 wrote:
It is a huge leap to claim that "the Church" had nothing to do with the spying. In fact, after these various incidents, the Church's surveillance and spying activities were consolidated in the SCMC. The Church is, and has long been, interested in spying on dissidents.


When you can come up with a single, bare shred of evidence to this end, let us all know. Until then, I'm going to send you a year's supply of tin foil, as I'm sure you'll be needing it in ever increasing quantities as time moves forward.


I think this issue is best addressed by those who've actually bothered to do the reading.
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

I
think this issue is best addressed by those who've actually bothered to do the reading.


I observed the argument develope between you and rc. I weighed the evidence and argument style on both sides. You nose dived into your own steaming pile as usual.

Case closed.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.


- Thomas S. Monson
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Coggins7 wrote:I
think this issue is best addressed by those who've actually bothered to do the reading.


I observed the argument develope between you and rc. I weighed the evidence and argument style on both sides. You nose dived into your own steaming pile as usual.

Case closed.


There is no evidence here. There is nothing. Not a link, not a citation, not a quoting of text which would indicate any comprehension or understanding of the issues. The facts remain: the LDS Church and its representatives have engaged in espionage/spying. This took place at BYU, and may very well continue to this day. This has been documented in numerous sources, including the Prince and Quinn texts which have already been noted. The spying included: dissidents, "liberals," and homosexuals, and perhaps others. There can be no question that the Church was involved on some level. Moreover, the fact that the Church still sanctions and maintains dossiers at the Strengthening the Members Committee is further evidence of all of this.
_Coggins7
_Emeritus
Posts: 3679
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:25 am

Post by _Coggins7 »

There is no evidence here. There is nothing. Not a link, not a citation, not a quoting of text which would indicate any comprehension or understanding of the issues. The facts remain: the LDS Church and its representatives have engaged in espionage/spying. This took place at BYU, and may very well continue to this day. This has been documented in numerous sources, including the Prince and Quinn texts which have already been noted. The spying included: dissidents, "liberals," and homosexuals, and perhaps others. There can be no question that the Church was involved on some level. Moreover, the fact that the Church still sanctions and maintains dossiers at the Strengthening the Members Committee is further evidence of all of this.



The fact remains, your claim that the LDS Church or its official representatives as a church, have engaged in "espionage/spying: is a smiling ear to ear lie, for which you have no substantive evidence, and which rc demolished as you watched helplessly on this thread, page by page.

"The Church" appears to have no involvement in either of the matters in question.

The Church maintains a knowledge base on dissidents and apostates, especially the more mendacious and prevaricating of them, as a record and testimony against them, should they continue on this path until the time for repentance is past.

Hardly sinister, and hardly outside there right as an organization do not seem to be able to tell the truth about either it or their own, many times less than sterling motivations. Maintaining "dossiers" on dissidents and sniping malcontents is hardly espionage or spying, as the dossiers can be easily constructed from publically available media, published and made public by the critics themselves.
The face of sin today often wears the mask of tolerance.


- Thomas S. Monson
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

Coggins7 wrote:
There is no evidence here. There is nothing. Not a link, not a citation, not a quoting of text which would indicate any comprehension or understanding of the issues. The facts remain: the LDS Church and its representatives have engaged in espionage/spying. This took place at BYU, and may very well continue to this day. This has been documented in numerous sources, including the Prince and Quinn texts which have already been noted. The spying included: dissidents, "liberals," and homosexuals, and perhaps others. There can be no question that the Church was involved on some level. Moreover, the fact that the Church still sanctions and maintains dossiers at the Strengthening the Members Committee is further evidence of all of this.



The fact remains, your claim that the LDS Church or its official representatives as a church, have engaged in "espionage/spying: is a smiling ear to ear lie, for which you have no substantive evidence, and which rc demolished as you watched helplessly on this thread, page by page.


Bob got caught bending the facts, as his above backpedaling clearly demonstrates. Further, the LDS Church and its official representatives (including a former BYU president) absolutely sanctioned spying/espionage activities. Feel free to actually crack open a book and read up on it.

"The Church" appears to have no involvement in either of the matters in question.


Then why is there a special, dedicated branch of Church Security which is devoted to "intelligence gathering" and "surveillance"?

[quoteThe Church maintains a knowledge base on dissidents and apostates, especially the more mendacious and prevaricating of them, as a record and testimony against them, should they continue on this path until the time for repentance is past.[/quote]

There is really no reason why the Lord's One True Church should need to maintain secret smear files on critics and dissidents.

Hardly sinister, and hardly outside there right as an organization do not seem to be able to tell the truth about either it or their own, many times less than sterling motivations.


This doesn't make any sense.

Maintaining "dossiers" on dissidents and sniping malcontents is hardly espionage or spying, as the dossiers can be easily constructed from publically available media, published and made public by the critics themselves.


I would argue that it *is* spying, especially given the fact that the Church goes to such pains to cloak everything in a patina of secrecy. I think that the Church would be better off ditching the dossiers altogether. The fact that they are sneaking around in order to do all of this stuff just makes it worse, in my opinion.
Post Reply