Runtu's Blog

Post by **_Boaz & Lidia** » Wed May 28, 2008 5:59 am

bcspace wrote:
You gotta admit the his post about the Youth Trek was boarder line youth brainwashing..

I agree. He attempts a subtle form of brainwashing with every post.

Boy, someone does not like Runtu!

Post by **_moksha** » Wed May 28, 2008 6:57 am

Boaz & Lidia wrote:
bcspace wrote:
You gotta admit the his post about the Youth Trek was boarder line youth brainwashing..

I agree. He attempts a subtle form of brainwashing with every post.
Boy, someone does not like Runtu!

Perhaps BC is merely disagreeing with what he had to say. I have always been a Runtu fan.

Post by **_solomarineris** » Wed May 28, 2008 1:13 pm

Bond...James Bond wrote:His blog kicks mighty butt. I wish he'd post here...I mean he's posting at MAD can't he post here!

WHY IS THAT?

_Yoda · Post by **_Yoda** » Wed May 28, 2008 1:21 pm

solomarineris wrote:
Bond...James Bond wrote:His blog kicks mighty butt. I wish he'd post here...I mean he's posting at MAD can't he post here!

WHY IS THAT?

I don't know. I chastised him for it in a comment I left on his blog. LOL

I asked him why he was posting at Slytherin, but not Gryffindor.

;)

Post by **_Runtu** » Wed May 28, 2008 2:46 pm

bcspace wrote:His blog is not that good. It's just more of the same old subjectively anecdotal antiMormon claptrap.

I agree with you that my blog is not that good, though I'm surprised you've bothered to read it. But I'm puzzled as to why you think my mission memoirs, which make up the bulk of the blog so far, are in any way "anti-Mormon," claptrap or otherwise. I have to admit that it bothers me quite a bit that you would say such a thing.

_Yoda · Post by **_Yoda** » Wed May 28, 2008 2:56 pm

Runtu wrote:
bcspace wrote:His blog is not that good. It's just more of the same old subjectively anecdotal antiMormon claptrap.

I agree with you that my blog is not that good, though I'm surprised you've bothered to read it. But I'm puzzled as to why you think my mission memoirs, which make up the bulk of the blog so far, are in any way "anti-Mormon," claptrap or otherwise. I have to admit that bothers me quite a bit that you woulld say such a thing.

I'm surprised at BC's comments regarding this as well. I have to admit, I posted a snippy comment to him, and then deleted it. Although BC and I have disagreed on many issues, I've always respected him. We've always managed to "break bread" at the end of the day.

I would like to give him a chance to explain himself.

And, Runtu, your blog is VERY well-written. It's hardly "anti-Mormon". It's simply very honest, and some people, apparently, have a hard time with that.

Oh...and... welcome back! I've missed you! :)

Post by **_Runtu** » Wed May 28, 2008 3:02 pm

liz3564 wrote:I'm surprised at BC's comments regarding this as well. I have to admit, I posted a snippy comment to him, and then deleted it. Although BC and I have disagreed on many issues, I've always respected him. We've always managed to "break bread" at the end of the day.

I would like to give him a chance to explain himself.

And, Runtu, your blog is VERY well-written. It's hardly "anti-Mormon". It's simply very honest, and some people, apparently, have a hard time with that.

Oh...and... welcome back! I've missed you! :)

Thanks. I have tried very hard to avoid writing the kind of blog bcspace describes. Maybe it's personal animus towards me, I don't know, but I really would like to know what's behind his comments.

Post by **_Blixa** » Wed May 28, 2008 4:36 pm

Runtu wrote:
Thanks. I have tried very hard to avoid writing the kind of blog bcspace describes. Maybe it's personal animus towards me, I don't know, but I really would like to know what's behind his comments.

I'm sorry this kind of thing gets to you, runtu. You've seen this kind of thing here before. It's one of the standard techniques for blocking serious discussion on this site. The there's nothing "behind" the comment except that.

Post by **_Runtu** » Wed May 28, 2008 4:38 pm

Blixa wrote:
Runtu wrote:
Thanks. I have tried very hard to avoid writing the kind of blog bcspace describes. Maybe it's personal animus towards me, I don't know, but I really would like to know what's behind his comments.

I'm sorry this kind of thing gets to you, runtu. You've seen this kind of thing here before. It's one of the standard techniques for blocking serious discussion on this site. The there's nothing "behind" the comment except that.

You're probably right. Still kind of gets to me, though.

Post by **_KimberlyAnn** » Wed May 28, 2008 4:50 pm

Runtu wrote:
Blixa wrote:
Runtu wrote:
Thanks. I have tried very hard to avoid writing the kind of blog bcspace describes. Maybe it's personal animus towards me, I don't know, but I really would like to know what's behind his comments.

I'm sorry this kind of thing gets to you, runtu. You've seen this kind of thing here before. It's one of the standard techniques for blocking serious discussion on this site. The there's nothing "behind" the comment except that.

You're probably right. Still kind of gets to me, though.

John, ignore the troglodyte. Who cares what he thinks? He wouldn't know good writing if it slapped him upside the head.

I think you're wonderful and that your writing is, too.

I lurve you.

Kimberly Ann