The Nehor wrote:Chap wrote:Certain people (the majority in some cultures) use the word 'witch' non-metaphorically and with regularity, but there are in reality no people who correspond to that word in an objective sense; there are just people to whom the word gets applied for reasons which are not inherent in the persons so referred to.
The expression 'blind person' on the other hand is also frequently used non-metaphorically, and since there really are people who cannot detect visual data, we can say that there are indeed people out there to whom this expression applies objectively, and that the expression is applied to them for reasons inherent in the persons so referred to.
My impression about the use of a phrase such as 'unworthy wretch' in a religious context is that it resembles the use of 'witch' much more than it does the use of 'blind person'. Regularity and non-metaphorical use is not enough to establish objective reference.
I think a better point of reference would be the term jerk. Most of us accept and believe there are in face people who are jerks. I think wretch falls under the same category. However, there is no real objective way of measuring whether someone is a jerk though experience has shown me that often there is a big enough consensus that I feel safe applying the term.
The more you limit your speech community, the more definite you will find the consensus about who is or is not a <insert opprobrious term>. The wider your speech community becomes, the more difficult it will be to reach any consensus on the use of terms whose basis is essentially subjective.