DANIEL C. PETERSON--GOD ASCENDANT!!!

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_LifeOnaPlate
_Emeritus
Posts: 2799
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2007 4:50 pm

Post by _LifeOnaPlate »

Image
Image
One moment in annihilation's waste,
one moment, of the well of life to taste-
The stars are setting and the caravan
starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste!

-Omar Khayaam

*Be on the lookout for the forthcoming album from Jiminy Finn and the Moneydiggers.*
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Dr. Peterson:

Say what you want about this place, but at the end of the day, you have to admit that you'd never get this sort of tribute from RfM.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Tarski
_Emeritus
Posts: 3059
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm

Post by _Tarski »

I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?
I am very surprised. I didn't see that coming.

Oh, congrats.
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie

yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Tarski wrote:I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?

If you were under intense attack whenever you showed up here (and pretty commonly even when you didn't) from Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Beastie and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Mercury and Scratch and Chap and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Scottie and Scratch and Scratch and Scratch, you would probably have run up a few more posts, too.
_malkie
_Emeritus
Posts: 2663
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:03 pm

Post by _malkie »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Tarski wrote:I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?

If you were under intense attack whenever you showed up here (and pretty commonly even when you didn't) from Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Beastie and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Mercury and Scratch and Chap and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Scottie and Scratch and Scratch and Scratch, you would probably have run up a few more posts, too.

Did you forget to mention "and Scratch"?
NOMinal member

Maksutov: "... if you give someone else the means to always push your buttons, you're lost."
_cksalmon
_Emeritus
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:20 pm

Post by _cksalmon »

Thanks for posting here. Seriously.

Chris
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Far out

Post by _moksha »

Doctor Steuss wrote: Rather than being infinite in all directions, as the most fashionable theory suggests, the universe could be radically smaller in one direction than the others. As a result it may be even be shaped like a doughnut.
- Dennis Overbye, "Universe as Doughnut: New Data, New Debate," New York Times, March 11, 2003.



That may be, but will it be covered with chocolate and have candy sprinkles the way Dr. Peterson, MDB-God, likes them?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Tarski wrote:I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?

If you were under intense attack whenever you showed up here (and pretty commonly even when you didn't) from Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Beastie and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Mercury and Scratch and Chap and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Scottie and Scratch and Scratch and Scratch, you would probably have run up a few more posts, too.

You are not under "attack," my dear doctor. Rather, your and my (and everyone else's) posts are debated. Anyhoo, to continue the good will of this thread, I again applaud your reaching exaltation.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
_rcrocket

Post by _rcrocket »

Rollo Tomasi wrote:
Daniel Peterson wrote:
Tarski wrote:I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?

If you were under intense attack whenever you showed up here (and pretty commonly even when you didn't) from Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Beastie and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Mercury and Scratch and Chap and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Scottie and Scratch and Scratch and Scratch, you would probably have run up a few more posts, too.

You are not under "attack," my dear doctor. Rather, your and my (and everyone else's) posts are debated. Anyhoo, to continue the good will of this thread, I again applaud your reaching exaltation.


Disingenuous is your middle name. Anonymous.Coward is your first name.

And, no, I have never posted anonymously. When I used a pseudonym in the past I signed my name.
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

rcrocket wrote:
Rollo Tomasi wrote:
Daniel Peterson wrote:
Tarski wrote:I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?

If you were under intense attack whenever you showed up here (and pretty commonly even when you didn't) from Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Beastie and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Mercury and Scratch and Chap and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Scottie and Scratch and Scratch and Scratch, you would probably have run up a few more posts, too.

You are not under "attack," my dear doctor. Rather, your and my (and everyone else's) posts are debated. Anyhoo, to continue the good will of this thread, I again applaud your reaching exaltation.

Disingenuous is your middle name.

When did truth become "disingenuous"?

Anonymous. Coward is your first name.

One-note wonder Bob strikes again!

And, no, I have never posted anonymously. When I used a pseudonym in the past I signed my name.

Whatever you say, ... Plutarch, Bishop Lee, et al.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
Post Reply