One moment in annihilation's waste, one moment, of the well of life to taste- The stars are setting and the caravan starts for the dawn of nothing; Oh, make haste! -Omar Khayaam
Say what you want about this place, but at the end of the day, you have to admit that you'd never get this sort of tribute from RfM.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?
I am very surprised. I didn't see that coming.
Oh, congrats.
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie
yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
Tarski wrote:I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?
If you were under intense attack whenever you showed up here (and pretty commonly even when you didn't) from Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Beastie and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Mercury and Scratch and Chap and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Scottie and Scratch and Scratch and Scratch, you would probably have run up a few more posts, too.
Tarski wrote:I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?
If you were under intense attack whenever you showed up here (and pretty commonly even when you didn't) from Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Beastie and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Mercury and Scratch and Chap and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Scottie and Scratch and Scratch and Scratch, you would probably have run up a few more posts, too.
Did you forget to mention "and Scratch"?
NOMinal member
Maksutov: "... if you give someone else the means to always push your buttons, you're lost."
Doctor Steuss wrote: Rather than being infinite in all directions, as the most fashionable theory suggests, the universe could be radically smaller in one direction than the others. As a result it may be even be shaped like a doughnut. - Dennis Overbye, "Universe as Doughnut: New Data, New Debate," New York Times, March 11, 2003.
That may be, but will it be covered with chocolate and have candy sprinkles the way Dr. Peterson, MDB-God, likes them?
Tarski wrote:I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?
If you were under intense attack whenever you showed up here (and pretty commonly even when you didn't) from Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Beastie and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Mercury and Scratch and Chap and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Scottie and Scratch and Scratch and Scratch, you would probably have run up a few more posts, too.
You are not under "attack," my dear doctor. Rather, your and my (and everyone else's) posts are debated. Anyhoo, to continue the good will of this thread, I again applaud your reaching exaltation.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
Tarski wrote:I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?
If you were under intense attack whenever you showed up here (and pretty commonly even when you didn't) from Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Beastie and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Mercury and Scratch and Chap and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Scottie and Scratch and Scratch and Scratch, you would probably have run up a few more posts, too.
You are not under "attack," my dear doctor. Rather, your and my (and everyone else's) posts are debated. Anyhoo, to continue the good will of this thread, I again applaud your reaching exaltation.
Disingenuous is your middle name. Anonymous.Coward is your first name.
And, no, I have never posted anonymously. When I used a pseudonym in the past I signed my name.
Tarski wrote:I was under the impression that, as a a critic (evil exmo?), I "frequent" messages boards like this, while Dr. Peterson would seldom waste his time with this board which he has often criticised. Yet I still have less posts than Dr. Peterson who is now a God with over 1000 posts?
If you were under intense attack whenever you showed up here (and pretty commonly even when you didn't) from Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Beastie and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Rollo Tomasi and Scratch and Mercury and Scratch and Chap and Scratch and poor antishock8 and Scratch and Scottie and Scratch and Scratch and Scratch, you would probably have run up a few more posts, too.
You are not under "attack," my dear doctor. Rather, your and my (and everyone else's) posts are debated. Anyhoo, to continue the good will of this thread, I again applaud your reaching exaltation.
Disingenuous is your middle name.
When did truth become "disingenuous"?
Anonymous. Coward is your first name.
One-note wonder Bob strikes again!
And, no, I have never posted anonymously. When I used a pseudonym in the past I signed my name.
Whatever you say, ... Plutarch, Bishop Lee, et al.
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."
-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)