Jason Bourne wrote:It is all in the presentation Rollo. Come on. What is the intent here. DCP has explained himself. You frankly are calling him a liar.
I'm simply pointing out what the data says on FARMS's publicly filed tax documents. So far, DCP has claimed that two of the three I have (he hasn't mentioned the third ... yet) are false. I find that a bit odd because people are generally careful about signing tax documents under oath and penalties of perjury.
Look FARMS is and NFP. But people who do work and services for an NFP get paid. Sometimes they get paid a lot. NFP does not mean it cannot be run like a business and pay people for services. You all are having a hey day-"Apologetics seems pretty lucrative." Hardly. And keep in mind that FARMS does A LOT more than apologetics. That seems very clear from the expenses you listed above.
DCP had been going on and on about how little he makes from apologia, and perhaps that's true, but the last public disclosures we have from FARMS suggest a very different picture. Which one is correct, I don't know, but at least we have some neutral, hard facts.
by the way, Tax returns are no signed under oath.
The Form 990 certainly is. I'm reading it right now. FARMS's 1999 Form 990 is signed by one Daniel Oswald as Executive Director, just under this statement:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this return, including accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete.
Sure sounds like an oath to me.