GoodK wrote:My point is to declare my contempt for parents who burden their offspring with religion. I don't think parents should have the right to cause so much psychological and emotional damage.
Perhaps you should attempt a grassroots-level push for legislation such that "religious" parents are forbidden by law to teach their religious beliefs to their children.
It might just be the only really "tolerant" thing to do.
Maybe parents should have only the private speech rights you would grant to them? Otherwise, via some Orwellian mechanism (no offense to Orwell, mind you), they should be prosecuted by the State.
This was a ludicrously silly position for Paul Kemp to take, as well, by the way.
Not to get too Droopy on you, but this really is the Left Hand of Darkness: "Free Speech extends just so far as it doesn't interfere with my desire to suppress the free speech of religious parents. It's child abuse! I am correct; you are wrong: therefore, you are forbidden to exercise free speech, since you're an R-tard."
My point is to declare that you have no right to determine what parents teach their children in the privacy of their homes. (I think this sort of thing is actually catching on in Canada, however.--just a heads up.)
You have a manifest axe to grind. Which is fine, for now, I think. I think I just might, too, perhaps (I don't really know), were I in your situation (a de-convert from Mormonism). I would like to think that the supporters of your radically-intrusive, State-powered "remedy" here are quite few in number, however.
You post as quite the fundamentalist.