My point is that in order for McCain's supporters to continue to attack Obama due to his lack of experience, they will have to alter their argument as dart has demonstrated. This is a much less persuasive line of attack, because it relies on the willingness to weight Palin's gubernatorial experience as meaning more than Obama's legislative experience.
Again, Palin has much more executive administrative experience than Obama. Obama's main claim to qualifications are his four years in the Senate and his community organizing. But "community organizing" is nothing more than a grass roots rent seeking expidition that attempts to transfer taxpayer dollars and political power to various groups and interests dependent upon government for their existence and influence.
I see no evidence that Obama ever created a single real job in Chicago, or ever brought any new net wealth into the inner city neighborhoods he claims to have been so concerned about. Is bringing government largess into low income neighborhoods really "helping" them? More government programs and paternalism? Is this a qualification for the Presidency?
Oh, and didn't Obama's community organizing carry ideological weight?
According to an article in
The Nation:
Obama worked in the organizing tradition of Saul Alinsky, who made Chicago the birthplace of modern community organizing, as translated through the Gamaliel Foundation, one of several networks of faith-based organizing.
In the tradition of Saul Alinkski? Yup, and if you don't know who Alinski was, or what he believed, I'd suggest you educate yourself on the subject before you vote this November (Alinksi was a personal friend and a major intellectual mentor to Hillary Clinton as well).
Who and what is the Gamaliel Foundation? Discover the Networks describes it thus:
* Network of grassroots organizations working to bring about social change
* Models its tactics after those of the radical Sixties activist Saul Alinsky
The stated mission of the Gamaliel Foundation (GF) is "to be a powerful network of grassroots, interfaith, interracial, multi-issue organizations working together to create a more just and more democratic society." Predicated on the notion that America is a land rife with injustice, GF agitates for social change by supporting the efforts of a network of organizations (the Gamaliel Network) whose goal is to allow for individuals to "effectively participate" in the political, environmental, social and economic arenas. GF offers, for its network affiliates, programs to teach techniques and methodologies for bringing about social change; ongoing consultations; and organizer recruitment campaigns.
The Gamaliel Foundation derives its name from the biblical figure who, according to the New Testament, chastised the Jewish Sanhedrin (rabbinical court) for wanting to give the death penalty to Jesus's apostles. Says GF, "We work in the hope and the confidence that this work is of God." GF was established in 1968 to support the Contract Buyers League, an African American organization fighting to protect homeowners on Chicago's West Side who had been discriminated against by banks and lending institutions.
The Gamaliel Network receives much of its funding from the leftist group Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD). Yet according to the Roman Catholic Faithful website, GF's "goals and philosophies are at fundamental odds with Church teaching." GF endorses "scriptural relativism"and "encourage[s] a wide range of scriptural interpretations."
The Gamaliel Foundation models itself after the activism of the 1960s radical Saul Alinsky, who authored the books Reveille for Radicals (1946), The Professional Radical (1970), and Rules for Radicals (1971). Alinsky's prescription for effective organizing consisted of the following elements: (a) Develop a "trade union in the social factory" to serve as a vehicle by which people in the neighborhood can bargain, strike, and struggle to advance their agendas; (b) create a power-oriented community organization willing to use militant, confrontational tactics; and (c) promote a democratic organization where organizers do not themselves lead, but rather develop local leaders so as to create the veneer of self-determination and grassroots democracy.
GF likens its own mission to that of the biblical apostle Paul. "In Corinthians," explains GF, "Paul states, 'I am Paul, a disciple of Gamaliel.' Saul Alinsky made all of his organizers read the letters of Paul because he regarded his namesake to be one of the greatest organizers of all time."
The Gamaliel Foundation takes a strong stand against current homeland security measures and immigration restrictions. In September of 2003, for example, Ana Garcia-Ashley, GF's Director of Civil Rights for Immigrants, described the Patriot Act as an "attack on immigrants." Moreover, GF seeks to persuade the U.S. government to "legalize and provide rights to tax-paying [illegal] immigrants in this country.” "We support any immigration legislation," adds GF, "that secures the civil rights of all immigrants; leads to the legalization of undocumented persons; provides for full labor protection and labor rights of immigrants; ends the inhumane detention and warehousing of asylum seekers; ends deportation for minor offenses; encourages family unity; provides security of our borders; includes humane border enforcement policies; [and] protects the civil liberties of all people."
The Gamaliel Foundation is a sponsoring organization of the Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride Coalition, which seeks to secure ever-expanding rights and civil liberties protections for illegal immigrants, and policy reforms that diminish or eliminate restrictions on immigration.
At its 2003 National Leadership Assembly in Milwaukee, GF assembled a large number of leftist religious leaders to launch a voter drive against the incumbent Bush administration. At the event, featured speaker Rev. Tommie Pierson of Metropolitan Congregations United stated that he looked forward to the sound "of furniture being moved out of the White House." Also attending the event were Democratic Senator Russ Feingold and Democratic Presidential candidate and Progressive Caucus member Dennis Kucinich.
Gregory Galluzzo, a former Jesuit priest, is the Executive Director of the Gamaliel Foundation. In 1980 Galluzzo co-founded, along with his wife Mary Gonzalez, a Chicago Latino activist organization called the United Neighborhood Organization (UNO). Today, Ms. Gonzalez is the Gamaliel Foundation's Director of Western Territory. UNO, also modeled after Alinsky's methods, is known for using aggressive organizing and confrontational tactics to push for change.
The President of the Board of the Gamaliel Foundation is Ann Smith, who in 1985 became the first black female to win a statewide election in Illinois when she was voted onto the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.
The Gamaliel Foundation receives grants from the Bauman Family Foundation, the Public Welfare Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the Ford Foundation, George Soros's Open Society Institute, and others.
In essence, Barak was involved in the politicization and radicalization of poor, inner city residents for the purpose of advancing both an ideological agenda and the diversion and concentration taxpayer funds and state power into those inner city neighborhoods in the form of government services, economic protectionism (the steel industry),and the theory of personal success and empowerment through political agitation and activity (as opposed to hard work, sacrifice, and sound values).
Alinski, Dorn, Ayers, Pfligar, Davis, Wright...Obama is not only thoroughly unqualified to be President, his roster of mentors and close political associates belies an ideology wholly incongruent with the principles of the Founding as well as present mainstream political leangins across a broad swath of the electorate from both parties.
Let's cut to the chase: Obama is a revolutionary socialist, a black nationalist, and a traditional nanny state leftist, and for all that, its not his clear lack of qualifications for the job so much as his clear lack of
knowledge and judgement that are key.
The fact is that McCain has declared Obama "dangerously unprepared to lead", and has attacked his lack of experience to bolster that charge. Yet, he now has declared Palin "ready to be president".
Margarate Thatcher, too, had little foreign policy experience of knowledge upon entering office, but surrounded herself with experts who did. She learned on the job. Palin is not running for President, McCain is.
Palin, who, by her own admission, hasn't even thought much about the war in Iraq, is "ready to be president" because she was the governor of Alaska.
Neither has Obama, given his pronouncements on the subject thus far, thought much about the Iraq war. Obama is, indeed, dangerously naïve, uninformed, and intellectually thin on the Iraq situation, as well as on other important issues, such as energy.