Why did Master BateMan hate individual mens sports?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Why did Master BateMan hate individual mens sports?

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

I was at BYU during the Bateman years, and I heard a great deal about Title IX and its impact on the smaller men's sports program -- at BYU and elsewhere -- especially given the fact that I really don't care much about intercollegiate athletics.

What happened at BYU wasn't unusual during the period. In fact, it was quite typical. There's no need at all to invoke any supposed special antipathy on the part of Merrill Bateman toward smaller men's athletic programs in order to explain what happened.
_KimberlyAnn
_Emeritus
Posts: 3171
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm

Re: Why did Master BateMan hate individual mens sports?

Post by _KimberlyAnn »

Buckeye wrote:A quick search shows that "CFR" has been used in 521 posts since February 7, 2007 - well now 522!


Yes, it's been used 522 times out of around 180,000 posts. I've no calculator in front of me, but I guesstimate that's around, what, a third of a percent? I wonder how many of those 522 (now 523!) posts weren't actually calling for a reference, but were instead quoting portions of posts which had previously called for references? Perhaps like my quote of you, and your quote of me, and now this reply which, again, uses "CFR" but is in no way calling for a reference?

Here's what I said:

KimberlyAnn wrote:...I assure you "CFR" isn't used often here...


I was right about "CFR" not being used often on this board. I was right about there being no requirement to supply references.

Buckeye wrote:Kimberly Ann is right...


You're finally catching on! (Hey, I took my cue from the Gospel Doctrine manual's treatment of the Wentworth letter.)

KA
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Why did Master BateMan hate individual mens sports?

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

It's not clear to me that making sweeping allegations without any obligation to back them up is an unqualifiedly good thing.
_KimberlyAnn
_Emeritus
Posts: 3171
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 2:03 pm

Re: Why did Master BateMan hate individual mens sports?

Post by _KimberlyAnn »

Daniel Peterson wrote:It's not clear to me that making sweeping allegations without any obligation to back them up is an unqualifiedly good thing.


It's not clear to me, either; however, new posters to the board should be aware that they are not required to provide references, even if requested.

KA
_squawkeye
_Emeritus
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:12 pm

Re: Why did Master BateMan hate individual mens sports?

Post by _squawkeye »

Ah yes, my old roomie told me about the Peter-man. I see he was correct. Another damn Utah Mormon.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Why did Master BateMan hate individual mens sports?

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

squawkeye wrote:Ah yes, my old roomie told me about the Peter-man. I see he was correct. Another damn Utah Mormon.

Born and raised and educated to the doctoral level in California.
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Re: Why did Master BateMan hate individual mens sports?

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

Maybe he was opposed to sweaty guys in tight shorts grabbing each other and rolling around on a mat while other guys watch. More likely, it was Title IX.
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Why did Master BateMan hate individual mens sports?

Post by _harmony »

SatanWasSetUp wrote:Maybe he was opposed to sweaty guys in tight shorts grabbing each other and rolling around on a mat while other guys watch.


I was kinda leaning this way too, except that gymnasts don't grab each other (although they do have tight ... ummm... uniforms).

More likely, it was Title IX.


Those damn women. If they'd just stayed in the kitchen, the men would still be wrestling in Provo.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_cinepro
_Emeritus
Posts: 4502
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm

Re: Why did Master BateMan hate individual mens sports?

Post by _cinepro »

Buckeye wrote:And as to God's influence in hiring and firing, I have never heard of any position at BYU being treated as a church calling. I'm not saying every decision is made without prayer or the spirit, just that callings and employment are apples and oranges.


I had thought that LDS faculty had spiritual requirements as a condition of their employment, such as payment of tithing. While this wouldn't make it a "church calling", it would definitely distinguish it from teaching positions at more secular colleges.
_Buckeye
_Emeritus
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 3:39 pm

Re: Why did Master BateMan hate individual mens sports?

Post by _Buckeye »

cinepro wrote:I had thought that LDS faculty had spiritual requirements as a condition of their employment, such as payment of tithing. While this wouldn't make it a "church calling", it would definitely distinguish it from teaching positions at more secular colleges.


I'm not sure what you mean by "spiritual qualifications". Membership in the church is not a requirement for faculty or students, so long as the individual adheres to the standards (WOW, chastity, etc.).
And inasmuch as my people shall assemble themselves at the Ohio, I have kept in store a blessing such as is not known among the children of men, and it shall be poured forth upon their heads. And from thence men shall go forth into all nations.

Doctrine & Covenants 39:15.
Post Reply