GoodK wrote:But I'm sure you'll atone for all these nice sentences soon enough and I won't feel conflicted because you're a nice guy otherwise.
JustMe wrote:
When I see what I think is deliberate mishandling of ideas and denigrating good people, I will slash back.
So you can understand where those on the other side are coming from when someone we consider "good people" is treated the same way, right?
Like what happens more than occassionally in the FARMS Review of authors... ahem... I mean books.
Or when "whisper campaigns" are launched against people that we consider "good people" like Brother Quinn.
Or when annonymous posters are outed to their Mormon families out of spite.
I hope your statement means that you can relate to what others consider "slashing back."
If one doesn't like me taking on the stupidity, one can always ignore what I write.
That is not the issue, at least for me.
It's not rocket science, it's simple manners and respect for the other.
Question: Do you think referring to people as "antis" is simple manners and respect?
What about saying or implying that "critics" don't read books?
Would that be the same sort of simple manners and respect that you demand from others?