MDB Survivor

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.

Which Poster Should Voluntarily and Permanently Cease from Posting in the Terrestrial Forum?

Poll ended at Sun Oct 26, 2008 7:26 pm

 
Total votes: 0

_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Re: MDB Survivor

Post by _Scottie »

Mister Scratch wrote:
Scottie wrote:Nope. I would never de-invite anyone from posting on this board.


Gee, thank you so much for the useful suggestion.

The usefulness of the suggestion was precisely as useful as the question.
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_skippy the dead
_Emeritus
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:39 am

Re: MDB Survivor

Post by _skippy the dead »

Where's the "I can't seem to make myself give a rat's ass about a personal spat on the board" option?
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: MDB Survivor

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

liz3564 wrote:when you were falsely accused of maligning DCP on RfM

Just for the record:

I've always acknowledged that I can't prove and don't know for certain that the " Mister Scratch" who maligned me rather crudely on RfM was the same as the "Mister Scratch" who was devoting considerable effort to attacking me at the same time on the board formerly known as FAIR (and who now devotes the bulk of his time and effort to attacking me, and people and things connected with me, here on MDB). But no other clearly distinct "Mister Scratch" has ever turned up, and, for various reasons, I came to the conclusion some years ago that the probability that the two "Scratches" were one and the same was very high. (His monomaniacal crusade against me here, now roughly two years old, only seems to strengthen that conclusion.) I don't think he was falsely accused.

liz3564 wrote:I think that you should consider the fact that he engaged you a victory.

I presume that he already does, which is one of the considerations (along with the sheer pointless futility of the exercise) that's causing me to lose interest in engaging him further.

liz3564 wrote:The posters are about evenly divided in their views of DCP, from what I have read here. So, you have been able to influence posters' opinion of DCP, for better or worse.

That doesn't seem obvious to me. Do you really think that I ever enjoyed an approval rating here higher than 50%? I very much doubt it.
_Yoda

Re: MDB Survivor

Post by _Yoda »

Scottie wrote:The usefulness of the suggestion was precisely as useful as the question.


LOL! I think I just found my new sig line. ;)
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Re: MDB Survivor

Post by _Scottie »

Daniel Peterson wrote:Do you really think that I ever enjoyed an approval rating here higher than 50%? I very much doubt it.

I guess that depends on what you consider an approval??

As for me, you can count me as a fan with the caveat that I am skeptical of some of your obfuscations and non-answers. You have a unique talent of being able to pick and choose which parts of an argument you wish to address and ignoring the parts where you have no good answer. I think you have chosen a niche field that frightens many people and allows you to make yourself appear smarter than you actually are. Not that you aren't smart... just not as smart as the DCP worshipers think you are.

I very much enjoy your posts, even though I don't agree with your outcomes most time. Your posts make me laugh...often!!
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_Yoda

Re: MDB Survivor

Post by _Yoda »

skippy the dead wrote:Where's the "I can't seem to make myself give a rat's ass about a personal spat on the board" option?


I like this one, too. ;)
_rcrocket

Re: MDB Survivor

Post by _rcrocket »

Hey, I want my own personal spat thread with Scratch. I would find that "troublesome" and "disturbing."
_Scottie
_Emeritus
Posts: 4166
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 9:54 pm

Re: MDB Survivor

Post by _Scottie »

liz3564 wrote:
skippy the dead wrote:Where's the "I can't seem to make myself give a rat's ass about a personal spat on the board" option?


I like this one, too. ;)

Sounds like a Dr Suess line.
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman

I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: MDB Survivor

Post by _Dr. Shades »

[MODERATOR NOTE: I re-calibrated the poll to account for two obvious options--"both" and "neither"--that weren't originally included. Sorry, Mister Scratch, but it had to be done.

Even if you previously voted, you may now vote again.]
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: MDB Survivor

Post by _Gadianton »

Sorry, Mister Scratch, but it had to be done


Why?
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
Post Reply