Daniel Peterson wrote:You think I'm a buffoon, I think you're a buffoon, and life is pretty good. I'm content.
Yep. All's well in Zion.
Daniel Peterson wrote: Some Schmo wrote:...this, coming from the king of implausible claims and master of self-deception.
ROTFLMAO
I appreciate the laugh. Really.
Not actually a very cogent rebuttal (if that's what it was intended to be).
No. People who are genuinely confident in themselves don't need to rebut others' claims about them (something I've noticed that you don't seem to understand - or perhaps you do, but just lack that confidence). I'm not concerned about your opinion of me or the weight of your credibility, so there's no need to rebut your ideas about me.
Daniel Peterson wrote: Mormonism is manifestly still very much on your mind, and a huge chip is on your shoulder. I can't see any reasonable way to deny that.
Ooooo... where's a good DCP quote I can use about how you know more about my thoughts, ideas and behaviors than I do. That would be awesome right here.
Are you trying to make a claim that you can tell much about a person by the way they post? Are you sure you want to step through that door?
LOL
Daniel Peterson wrote:So your claim that you feel "normal" and that you scarcely remember your connection with Mormonism is not at all credible. Unless, of course, "normalcy" for you is a huge chip on your shoulder -- which, I suppose, is possible.
But see, it's hard to take someone seriously who claims to know as much about Mormon history as you do and yet still believe it. Obviously, your assessment of what's "credible" is entirely suspect.
But please, enjoy your beliefs about me. I'm sure they entertain and comfort you as much as your fantasies about the church's truthfulness.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.