The Bitter Fruits of Apostacy

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

The Bitter Fruits of Apostacy

Post by _Gazelam »

Image

Next week in Elders Quorum we are Doing the lesson on "The bitter fruits of apostacy". Which you can view here - Here

Rather than scan over the website here looking for quotable quotes, I thought I would ask those of you who might call themselves apostate why it is you left the church, and if you feel any bitterness towards it now that you have left.

For the sake of time, as I might use your quotes in class when I lead the lesson, please keep it down to no more than three paragraphs.

much thanks

Gaz
.
.
.
.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: The Bitter Fruits of Apostacy

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Gazelam wrote:Rather than scan over the website here looking for quotable quotes, I thought I would ask those of you who might call themselves apostate why it is you left the church, and if you feel any bitterness towards it now that you have left.

I left the church because I found out it was not true. Yes, I feel bitterness since I was deceived by the church into believing its knowingly whitewashed version of itself.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Re: The Bitter Fruits of Apostacy

Post by _Gadianton »

Hi Gaz,

I think you can best illustrate the "bitter fruits of apostasy" and the contrasting sweet fruits of the faithful by a thorough discussion of Novak's rule and sharing examples of email exchanges from SHIELDS between apologists and critics, where the apologists make the critics look like a bunch of dumb apes.
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
_cinepro
_Emeritus
Posts: 4502
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm

Re: The Bitter Fruits of Apostacy

Post by _cinepro »

The lesson really goes overboard in caricaturing the role of "apostate". Certainly, there is a small percentage of disaffected members who rail against the church and wallow in bitterness. But from the first days of the restoration, I would suggest that the majority of those who fall away or leave continue to have productive, happy, healthy lives away from the Church, with many giving no more thought to the Church than one might give to a long forsaken gym membership.

But you can't really stand up in Elder's Quorum and point out that it's possible to leave the Church and be just as well (or even better) off. Heck, I would be shocked if it were ever taught in Church why those early "apostates" actually left, instead of misrepresenting and reducing their motivations with silly stories of "milk strippings" and misspelled names.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: The Bitter Fruits of Apostacy

Post by _harmony »

cinepro wrote:The lesson really goes overboard in caricaturing the role of "apostate". Certainly, there is a small percentage of disaffected members who rail against the church and wallow in bitterness. But from the first days of the restoration, I would suggest that the majority of those who fall away or leave continue to have productive, happy, healthy lives away from the Church, with many giving no more thought to the Church than one might give to a long forsaken gym membership.

But you can't really stand up in Elder's Quorum and point out that it's possible to leave the Church and be just as well (or even better) off. Heck, I would be shocked if it were ever taught in Church why those early "apostates" actually left, instead of misrepresenting and reducing their motivations with silly stories of "milk strippings" and misspelled names.


Another reason to avoid Relief Society like the plague.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: The Bitter Fruits of Apostacy

Post by _bcspace »

But you can't really stand up in Elder's Quorum and point out that it's possible to leave the Church and be just as well (or even better) off.


Would you like me to do it? Teaching hat-looking and seer stones in GD just re-emphasized to me that there's no such thing as a differentiation between internet and chapel Mormons. So I fully expect that the elders and high priests understand that one might not be LDS and still be prosperous and happy.

It's the final spiritual condition that counts and the LDS Church is the only avenue to achieve perfection and a fulness of joy; if that's what you want.....

Mortality is too short for most people to become bored or dissatisfied with temporal happiness. Therein lies the weakness of many.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_Inconceivable
_Emeritus
Posts: 3405
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:44 am

Re: The Bitter Fruits of Apostacy

Post by _Inconceivable »

Hi Gaz,

I may give you a quote later.

As you know, I'm a former Mormon. I believe that to know the Mormon God is to know the Mormon church. Unfortunately, I may know him better than most Mormons.

No TBM has touched this thread.

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=8453
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: The Bitter Fruits of Apostacy

Post by _Hoops »

Gadianton wrote:Hi Gaz,

I think you can best illustrate the "bitter fruits of apostasy" and the contrasting sweet fruits of the faithful by a thorough discussion of Novak's rule and sharing examples of email exchanges from SHIELDS between apologists and critics, where the apologists make the critics look like a bunch of dumb apes.



Why would you ask him to lie?
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: The Bitter Fruits of Apostacy

Post by _moksha »

bcspace wrote:Teaching hat-looking and seer stones in GD just re-emphasized to me that there's no such thing as a differentiation between internet and chapel Mormons.


Wonder if we will ever get to this point of history in my ward. This is probably one of those areas that are contingent upon the instructor having time spent on the internet.

.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Ray A

Re: The Bitter Fruits of Apostacy

Post by _Ray A »

Gazelam wrote:
Rather than scan over the website here looking for quotable quotes, I thought I would ask those of you who might call themselves apostate why it is you left the church, and if you feel any bitterness towards it now that you have left.


It all felt fake, for a start. A fake me, a fake (church) marriage, fake friends (people you'd not normally choose as friends), fake home teaching (we really must do this), fake liking of certain things "because you're supposed to like them", just too many fakes.

The reading of "alternative history" (Sunstone, Dialogue, Journal of Mormon History, and even to some extent BYU Studies, et.al) made me realise I really belonged to another community - the doubting and questioning one. One day while in Church, I think about 1983, I thought to myself, this isn't progress, I'm stagnating in mind and spirit, and just following the leader. From those initial thoughts would begin what has now been nearly 26 years of doing my own studying and thinking. It has been very liberating.

I feel no bitterness towards the Church, but it's a lifestyle I could never again "put on". For me, it's just too fake. And that's the only way I can inadequately describe it.
Last edited by _Ray A on Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply