Q:
Why does the omnipotent perfect God of Christianity require blood in order to forgive sin?
A: Because their god is a freakin' psychopath.
Why does the omnipotent perfect God of Christianity require blood in order to forgive sin?
Jason I am unsure why you feel so sure of the God demanding blood thing. After all it is God who bleed. You are being very certain about something with very shaky foundation. Are you referring to some scriptural view? what? Are you referring to some theological tradtion? Where?
Demanded blood from whom for heaven sakes? And who was it who demanded Jesus blood? It was sinners not God.
It seems futile to try and explain why God demands blood when everythng I know and think says this is not the case.
Roger Morrison wrote:Hi Jason, you asked:[Why does the omnipotent perfect God of Christianity require blood in order to forgive sin?
/quote]
I will attempt to answer, but first... Do I correctly sense facetiousness in your query?
Roger
*
*
Elder Oaks: http://ldsces.org/general%20authority%2 ... 0Oaks.html
Unlike the changeable laws of man, the laws of God are fixed and permanent, “irrevocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world” (D&C 130:20).
According to eternal law, the consequences that follow from the justice of God are severe and permanent. When a commandment is broken, a commensurate penalty is imposed. This happens automatically. Punishments prescribed by the laws of man only follow the judge’s action, but under the laws of God the consequences and penalties of sin are inherent in the act. “There is a law given, and a punishment affixed,” the prophet Alma taught, and “justice claimeth the creature and executeth the law, and the law inflicteth the punishment” (Alma 42:22). “And thus we see,” Alma explained, “that all mankind were fallen, and they were in the grasp of justice; yea, the justice of God, which consigned them forever to be cut off from his presence” (v. 14). Abinadi taught that the Lord himself “cannot deny justice when it has its claim” (Mosiah 15:27). By itself, justice is uncompromising.
The justice of God holds each of us responsible for our own transgressions and automatically imposes the penalty. This reality should permeate our understanding, and it should influence all our teachings about the commandments of God and the effect of individual transgressions.
In keeping with the legal traditions of man, many seem to want justice. It is true that justice is a friend that will protect us from persecution by the enemies of righteousness. But justice will also see that we receive what we deserve, and that is an outcome I fear. I cannot achieve my eternal goals on the basis of what I deserve. Though I try with all my might, I am still what King Benjamin called an “unprofitable servant” (see Mosiah 2:21). To achieve my eternal goals, I need more than I deserve. I need more than justice.
This realization reminds me of an event that occurred in the law firm where I began practicing law almost thirty-five years ago. A Chicago politician had been indicted for stuffing ballot boxes. A partner in our firm told me how this politician came to his office to ask us to represent him in his criminal trial.
“What can you do for me?” he asked. Our partner replied that if this client retained our firm to conduct his defense, we would investigate the facts, research the law, and present the defense at the trial. “In this way,” the lawyer concluded, “we will get you a fair trial.”
The politician promptly stood up, put on his hat, and stalked out of the office. Pursuing him down the hall, the lawyer asked what he had said to offend him. “Nothing.” “Then why are you leaving?” he asked. “The odds aren’t good enough,” the politician replied.
That man would not retain our firm to represent him in court because we would only promise him a fair trial, and he knew he needed more than that. He knew he was guilty, and he could only be saved from prison by something more favorable to him than justice.
Can justice save us? Can man in and of himself overcome the spiritual death all mankind suffers from the Fall, which we bring upon ourselves anew by our own sinful acts? No! Can we “work out our own salvation?” Never, worlds without end! “By the law no flesh is justified,” Lehi explained (2 Nephi 2:5). “Salvation doth not come by the law alone,” Abinadi warned (Mosiah 13:28). Shakespeare had one of his characters declare this truth: “In the course of justice, none of us should see salvation: we do pray for mercy” (The Merchant of Venice, act 4, sc. 1, lines 199–200).
Jason Bourne wrote:No. It is a serious question. I wonder why God cannot just forgive us without needing a sacrifice, even if it was him or his son.
huckelberry wrote:Hi Roger, We both understand the generic meaning of the word mystery. I was considering associations. I suspected you associated the word was with suppression of questions and enquiry one way or the other. that seems to be the dictionary/generic meaning I was trying to explain I mean the exact opposite. Then might you be using the wrong word? I was trying to imagine the correct punishement for religious authorities who use the precious word for evil intent like suppress the questions of youth. Perhaps tar and feather and run out town. Perhaps overly painfull and not long lasting enough... I don't know that punishment helps in many matters??? Knowledge, and the intelligence to grasp & apply it is what moves humanity forward; punishment, while it may seem to have immediate results--and gratifies the punisher--it is a poor means of social remediation...
My relationship to the word mystery is reflected in the Song of Solomon.
Song, refering to the book in the Bible.