Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_JoetheClerk
_Emeritus
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:11 am

Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

Post by _JoetheClerk »

We know some scholars agree the Bible has many locations that have proven to be archaelogical sites. It is basically a record of a region.

Has even one Book of Mormon archaelogical site been found?
Were any of the bones of the few hundred thousand killed in New York around the Hill Cumorah ever found? The armament, breastplates, metal swords and the like? Anything?

Has anything written in Hebrew, Egyptian or any closely allied language ever been found in the Book of Mormon lands from Canada to Chile? Anything at all? I know some Norse writings have been found in Greenland but know of no 'nephite or lamanite' writings that would give even a clue as to Hebrew origins.

BYU teaches 'Book of Mormon archaelogy'. How do you teach as a scientific discipline a myth?
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

Post by _bcspace »

Does anything like that have to be known to exist now in order for the Book of Mormon to be true?
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_selek
_Emeritus
Posts: 283
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:27 am

Re: Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

Post by _selek »

bcspace wrote:Does anything like that have to be known to exist now in order for the Book of Mormon to be true?


Yes. It's not that the Book of Mormon can be proven to be true. Rather, it's the ease at which it's proven to be untrue.
"There is no shame in watching porn." - why me, 08/15/11

"The answer is: ...poontang." - darricktevenson, 01/10/11

Daniel Peterson is a "Gap-Toothed Lizard Man" - Daniel Peterson, 12/06/08

Copyright© 1915 Simon Belmont, Esq., All Rights Up Your Butt.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

Post by _bcspace »

Does anything like that have to be known to exist now in order for the Book of Mormon to be true?

Yes. It's not that the Book of Mormon can be proven to be true. Rather, it's the ease at which it's proven to be untrue.


How would the supposed lack of such evidence prove it untrue? That's quite unscientific.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

Post by _moksha »

bcspace wrote:
How would the supposed lack of such evidence prove it untrue?


And why would any historical truth be required to appreciate the symbolic truths of the Book of Mormon?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Re: Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

Post by _Pokatator »

Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

Sure there is, in 2004, they dug up an 1830 edition of the Book of Mormon in Kirtland, Ohio when excavating for a new Piggly-Wiggly.

bcspace in a shreal voice: CFR!!!
I think it would be morally right to lie about your religion to edit the article favorably.
bcspace
_Joey
_Emeritus
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 1:34 am

Re: Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

Post by _Joey »

bcspace wrote:Does anything like that have to be known to exist now in order for the Book of Mormon to be true?


If the history never existed, how can the claim be true?
"It's not so much that FARMS scholarship in the area Book of Mormon historicity is "rejected' by the secular academic community as it is they are "ignored". [Daniel Peterson, May, 2004]
_SatanWasSetUp
_Emeritus
Posts: 1183
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:40 pm

Re: Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

Post by _SatanWasSetUp »

The most logical place to go for Book of Mormon archeology is in upstate New York, on and around the Hill Cumorah. This is where Joseph Smith claimed he found the gold plates. They were buried on that hill by Moroni. The Hill Cumorah in New York is the last location a Book of Mormon person was known to exist. For some reason, the Book of Mormon archeology is focused on Central America.
"We of this Church do not rely on any man-made statement concerning the nature of Deity. Our knowledge comes directly from the personal experience of Joseph Smith." - Gordon B. Hinckley

"It's wrong to criticize leaders of the Mormon Church even if the criticism is true." - Dallin H. Oaks
_cinepro
_Emeritus
Posts: 4502
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 10:15 pm

Re: Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

Post by _cinepro »

I think the first step in "Book of Mormon Archaeology" would be to find the Book of Mormon artifacts that were claimed to exist (and be in Joseph's possession) in 1829 (other than the Gold Plates and U&T)

- Laban's sword
- Ancient breastplate
- Liahona
- stone box of ancient construction
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Is there really Book of Mormon Archaeology?

Post by _The Nehor »

cinepro wrote:I think the first step in "Book of Mormon Archaeology" would be to find the Book of Mormon artifacts that were claimed to exist (and be in Joseph's possession) in 1829 (other than the Gold Plates and U&T)

- Laban's sword
- Ancient breastplate
- Liahona
- stone box of ancient construction


Moroni is storing them in my closet until he comes to get them.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
Post Reply