John Larsen wrote:This thread illustrates an important point, which has contributed to the overall success of Christianity. Namely, Jesus does not teach very many specific things and his ethic is quite broad without a lot of detail. The teachings of the New Testament, especially, are very elastic and can be bent into supporting a dizzying array of conclusions:The New Testament is such a great book because it can be used as a proof test to buttress just about anything you already believe.
- Asceticism? Check
- Monasticism? Check
- Celibacy? Check
- Large Families? Check
- War? Check
- Peace? Check
- Slavery? Check
- Prowess as a CEO? Check
- Socialism? Check
- Capitalism? Check
I tend to agree with this. The Gospels (in particular) are generally viewed by many scholars unconstrained by doctrinal commitments to inerrancy as being made up of a mass of originally unconnected 'sayings' and 'acts' that have been woven together into narratives at a later stage. We can say some things about the broad patterns of Jesus's life, teaching and death on the basis of what we read there (assuming we do not conclude that the whole thing is quite fictional, which I do not). But there is no hope of deriving a total ethical and religious system that is consistent with every word the Gospels contain.
That being the case, it is not surprising that people of very different inclinations apparently succeed in finding in the Gospels a great deal of what they were hoping to find there.