By any reasonable standard Joseph Smith was

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_JoetheClerk
_Emeritus
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:11 am

By any reasonable standard Joseph Smith was

Post by _JoetheClerk »

a Child Molestor.
Fanny Alger, and 'adopted daughter' caught in bed with Joseph while under 16 years old. Who screws their 'adopted daughter'?

The others who were under age were mainly young girls well known to Joseph. He watched many grow from young girls into teenagers and then made his move after building trust with them and their parents before doing so.

He married some and took their financial inheritance as well as their virginity.

Today he would be in Prison and should have been in the 1800's as well.

If you had lived then would you have let him have your 14-17 year old daughter?
_Yoda

Re: By any reasonable standard Joseph Smith was

Post by _Yoda »

Your question was actually asked on MAD a while ago, and it surprised me how many actually said that they wouldgive Joseph their daughters.

My answer would be a resounding HELL NO!
:wink:
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: By any reasonable standard Joseph Smith was

Post by _Dr. Shades »

JoetheClerk wrote:Fanny Alger, and 'adopted daughter' caught in bed with Joseph while under 16 years old. Who screws their 'adopted daughter'?

In FAIRness, Fanny was his housemaid, not his adopted daughter.

You're probably thinking of the Lawrence sisters, who were his foster (not adopted) daughters.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: By any reasonable standard Joseph Smith was

Post by _harmony »

liz3564 wrote:Your question was actually asked on MAD a while ago, and it surprised me how many actually said that they wouldgive Joseph their daughters.

My answer would be a resounding HELL NO!
:wink:


That is what separates you and I from them, Liz. We say "hell, no!" a lot. They bow their heads and say "yes".
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Yoda

Re: By any reasonable standard Joseph Smith was

Post by _Yoda »

Dr. Shades wrote:
JoetheClerk wrote:Fanny Alger, and 'adopted daughter' caught in bed with Joseph while under 16 years old. Who screws their 'adopted daughter'?

In FAIRness, Fanny was his housemaid, not his adopted daughter.

You're probably thinking of the Lawrence sisters, who were his foster (not adopted) daughters.


I thought I remembered reading that Emma actually referred to Fanny as an adopted daughter of sorts. She wasn't adopted in the legal sense, but was basically considered part of the family.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: By any reasonable standard Joseph Smith was

Post by _Dr. Shades »

liz3564 wrote:She wasn't adopted in the legal sense, but was basically considered part of the family.

I don't know; could be.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_JoetheClerk
_Emeritus
Posts: 115
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:11 am

Re: By any reasonable standard Joseph Smith was

Post by _JoetheClerk »

The 'adopted daughter' was from my reading it in a few accounts over the years.

Joseph picking the young ones by having them serve in his own home is sick. He was to care for them and privide a home, not choose young sexual conquests no matter what twist he put on it.
_Inconceivable
_Emeritus
Posts: 3405
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:44 am

Re: By any reasonable standard Joseph Smith was

Post by _Inconceivable »

liz3564 wrote:Your question was actually asked on MAD a while ago, and it surprised me how many actually said that they wouldgive Joseph their daughters.

My answer would be a resounding HELL NO!
:wink:


I guess this is the same tired old information they refer to at MAD. Nothing new since the DNA thing.

It's a disappointment that the statute of limitations on moral decency runs it's course amonst those that profess the belief in a God that delights in the chastity of women.
_Inconceivable
_Emeritus
Posts: 3405
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:44 am

Re: By any reasonable standard Joseph Smith was

Post by _Inconceivable »

JoetheClerk wrote:If you had lived then would you have let him have your 14-17 year old daughter?


Amazing that this question even has to be asked of any man (including a professed prophet of a loving God)

I am continually astonished at those that would be willing to sacrifice the souls or their daughters to the God of Joseph Smith.

To me, this represents the largest crack in the feet of clay and iron called Mormonism.
_Brackite
_Emeritus
Posts: 6382
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:12 am

Re: By any reasonable standard Joseph Smith was

Post by _Brackite »

"And I've said it before, you want to know what Joseph Smith looked like in Nauvoo, just look at Trump." - Fence Sitter
Post Reply