Ethics Scenario

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Locked
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Dr. Shades wrote:No; his stepfather's weightier faith in the priesthood instead of competent medical skill is what was being belittled. Not his sister. Not his family. His stepfather's MINDSET only.

His stepfather had "faith in the priesthood instead of competent medical skill"?

Wow! I corresponded with the stepfather during that period, and spoke with the stepfather on the telephone during that period, and conversed with the stepfather face to face during that period, and I never noticed that!

The stepfather spent considerable time at the hospital -- he'd come from out of state to do so -- and he seemed to be thoroughly on board with modern medical procedures, very concerned that his daughter receive the best possible treatment.

However, I certainly trust ideologically-hostile total strangers' opinions on message boards a lot more than I trust what I've seen and heard with my own eyes, so I'm going to be fundamentally revising my views on this case.

Thanks!
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _The Nehor »

Gadianton wrote:Well, I'll tell you what Nehor, it's only your apologetic mindset that sees a problem here. I think GoodK is:

A) Telling the truth about the place
B) Desires to bring it down because he's angry with it
C) "Milking" the "situation" for money.

I don't see a problem.


What problem does this 'apologetic mindset' see?
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Daniel Peterson wrote:
Dr. Shades wrote:No; his stepfather's weightier faith in the priesthood instead of competent medical skill is what was being belittled. Not his sister. Not his family. His stepfather's MINDSET only.

His stepfather had "faith in the priesthood instead of competent medical skill"?

Mea culpa; it was a poor choice of words on my part. Allow me to rephrase:

"No; his stepfather's weightier faith in the priesthood than competent medical skill is what was being belittled."
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_ludwigm
_Emeritus
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:07 am

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _ludwigm »

I think Bible verses are fit to the terrestrial environment, more than mud throwing (hungarian saying but there may be english equivalent ).

ludwigm wrote:... competent medical skill ...

Deuteronomy 21: 18 If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, 19 then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out 20 unto the elders of his city, and 21 all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die.
Picture moved to the telestial.

Proverbs 23: 13 Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him.
Picture moved to the telestial.

Proverbs 20: 30 Blows and wounds cleanse away evil, and beatings purge the inmost being.
Picture moved to the telestial.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco
- To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _Pokatator »

The Nehor wrote:I hardly think I'm going to turn up the crucial evidence to support it one way or the other


Nehor, are you talking about your visions or the Book of Mormon?

The Nehor wrote:I don't have the ability to concoct crazy fantasies with no evidence and parade them in front of people as if I've just made some amazing discovery.


You went on a mission didn't you?
I think it would be morally right to lie about your religion to edit the article favorably.
bcspace
_GoodK

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _GoodK »

The Nehor wrote:
Find out? Do you really think I have the time or disposition to investigate this?



Yes, I think you have more than enough time to "investigate" this. Clearly you do. But I'm sorry, I didn't know you were simply waxing poetic about being "curious."


Daniel Peterson wrote:Wow! I conversed with the stepfather face to face during that period, and I never noticed that!


Not true, you did not converse face to face with L. Ara Norwood.

The stepfather spent considerable time at the hospital


So did I. What about you? How much time did you spend at the hospital?

Oh, I remember. You couldn't be bothered. After all, Provo was a long drive. Besides, you do your work on the Message Boards.

rcrocket wrote:The long and the sort of this exchange is that it is evident Mr. Articulate never made a report. Ever.


The long and "sort" of it is Mr. Napoleon doesn't know what he is talking about, as usual. He doesn't know what reports have been filed, what sort of documentation I have. No one has seen all the pieces to this puzzle yet, which won't be available until my book is published.

But really, is this interesting to anyone? Wasn't this the same case three months ago -- clearly Mormons love the Mormon Gulag, and apologists defend it shamelessly like anything else. They attack me and my character like they do historians like Quinn. DCP spread vicious lies about me on the Internet, consistent with his typical apologetic endeavors. What's new here?
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

GoodK wrote:
Daniel Peterson wrote:Wow! I conversed with the stepfather face to face during that period, and I never noticed that!

Not true, you did not converse face to face with L. Ara Norwood.

I conversed face to face with L. Ara Norwood during that period.

GoodK wrote:How much time did you spend at the hospital?

I don't know your sister. I've never met her. Why on earth would I invade her room in the critical care unit?

GoodK wrote:Mormons love the Mormon Gulag, and apologists defend it shamelessly like anything else.

I've said not one word in defense of this place. I know nothing about it, and have no position on it. If it's bad, it needs to be fixed or shut down. If it's not, it doesn't.

GoodK wrote:They attack me and my character like they do historians like Quinn.

Yep. Precisely the same way. Which is not at all.

GoodK wrote:DCP spread vicious lies about me on the Internet, consistent with his typical apologetic endeavors.

When did I do this? Where?
_GoodK

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _GoodK »

Daniel Peterson wrote:I conversed face to face with L. Ara Norwood during that period.


LOL. It must have been a memorable experience for him.

Why on earth would I invade her room in the critical care unit?


Because that's what all his other "friends" did? My girlfriend at the time had also never met my sister, although she seemed very inclined to go visit her. I guess different people value different things. Never mind your ecclesiastical responsibilities.

GoodK wrote:DCP spread vicious lies about me on the Internet, consistent with his typical apologetic endeavors.

Daniel Peterson wrote:When did I do this? Where?



Page 1. This thread. A couple days ago. You need to lay off the grass, if your short term memory is that bad. I'm still waiting for your apology/excuse for such vile behavior. I wonder if such behavior is consistent with the values of Brigham Young University.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

GoodK wrote:Because that's what all his other "friends" did?

All of them did? None of them judged -- as I did, rightly or wrongly -- that it might be intrusive?

GoodK wrote:Never mind your ecclesiastical responsibilities.

I assume you mean my Christian duty, not my "ecclesiastical responsibilities." I had no ecclesiastical responsibility for either your stepfather or your sister. (Just to make that clear to people who might wonder.)

GoodK wrote:
Daniel Peterson wrote:When did I do this? Where?

Page 1. This thread. A couple days ago. You need to lay off the grass, if your short term memory is that bad.

Oh. Never mind. I thought you were serious.

Silly me.
_rcrocket

Re: Ethics Scenario

Post by _rcrocket »

GoodK wrote:But really, is this interesting to anyone? Wasn't this the same case three months ago -- clearly Mormons love the Mormon Gulag, and apologists defend it shamelessly like anything else. They attack me and my character like they do historians like Quinn. DCP spread vicious lies about me on the Internet, consistent with his typical apologetic endeavors. What's new here?


I have no interest in defending the Utah Boy's Ranch. If what you say is true, I wish you luck in getting it shut down.
Locked