rcrocket wrote: and that your Mormon Gulag story is a tissue of lies.
What lie/lies are you referring to? And what evidence/reasoning leads you to believe that?
rcrocket wrote: and that your Mormon Gulag story is a tissue of lies.
marg wrote:rcrocket wrote: and that your Mormon Gulag story is a tissue of lies.
What lie/lies are you referring to? And what evidence/reasoning leads you to believe that?
rcrocket wrote:Look, I don't know anything about the Utah Boy's Ranch.
asbestosman wrote:GoodK wrote:What do you mean by boundaries?
For starters, a permanent banning of anyone who even seriously contemplates a lawsuit against another board participant, even if it's for a very good reason.
GoodK wrote:By the way, your home address is now positively in cyberspace.
harmony wrote:GoodK wrote:By the way, your home address is now positively in cyberspace.
Not anymore, it's not. Put it up again or any other personal information about anyone registered on this board, and I'll figure out how to work the ban function.
GoodK wrote:harmony wrote:Not anymore, it's not. Put it up again or any other personal information about anyone registered on this board, and I'll figure out how to work the ban function.
Ummm... yeah it is.
I doubt that Dr. Shades will approve of you banning me.
You're sad harmony.
harmony wrote:I may be sad, but you're pathetic. And don't count on Shades being in your corner.
I am asking for some better boundaries to help make this nonsense much less frequent.