Board Lawsuits

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_marg

Re: Board Lawsuits

Post by _marg »

rcrocket wrote: and that your Mormon Gulag story is a tissue of lies.


What lie/lies are you referring to? And what evidence/reasoning leads you to believe that?
_rcrocket

Re: Board Lawsuits

Post by _rcrocket »

marg wrote:
rcrocket wrote: and that your Mormon Gulag story is a tissue of lies.


What lie/lies are you referring to? And what evidence/reasoning leads you to believe that?


Look, I don't know anything about the Utah Boy's Ranch. I'd never recommend sending a kid there.

But when you have Bozo the Clown standing at the lectern at Oxford carrying on about optics you ask yourself if you are hearing a joke or a lie.

And, further, if you know that Bozo lacks any kind of education, much less Classical or scientific or in English, you must ask yourself if Bozo is speaking in pig latin.

For the very same reason people wonder how credible FARMS Review is when it publishes the works of rank amateurs (can you really believe what a real estate agent says about the Kirtland Bank?), one must wonder how a kid who boasts about sociopathic behavior, who lacks an education, who has estranged himself from his family in a way 17-year-olds do, who threatens and extorts, who lacks an education (twice for emphasis), who makes innumerable spelling and grammar gaffes, and uses vulgarity to express himself when he gets upset in public, can be believed as to something as significant as a sociological treatment facility?
_marg

Re: Board Lawsuits

Post by _marg »

Crocket I asked you a question which was what lies do you think Eric has made with regards to the Westridge place. Your response was abusive towards Eric and you didn't answer my question other than to say you know nothing about the place.

Have you looked into other schools which offer behavior modification and what techniques they use? In addition what exactly do you think Eric said which was unreasonable with regards to that school?

You appear to be extremely abusive towards Eric, and he hasn't done anything to you, other than way back he criticized the "priesthood blessing". Are you unable to take criticism of Mormonism that you become abusive to individuals?
_Ray A

Re: Board Lawsuits

Post by _Ray A »

rcrocket wrote:Look, I don't know anything about the Utah Boy's Ranch.


You don't know anything about UBR yet you've accused Eric of making up lies. That's just about fits your track record.
_Tiktaalik
_Emeritus
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:17 pm

Re: Board Lawsuits

Post by _Tiktaalik »

asbestosman wrote:
GoodK wrote:What do you mean by boundaries?

For starters, a permanent banning of anyone who even seriously contemplates a lawsuit against another board participant, even if it's for a very good reason.


That sounds entirely reasonable.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Board Lawsuits

Post by _harmony »

GoodK wrote:By the way, your home address is now positively in cyberspace.


Not anymore, it's not. Put it up again or any other personal information about anyone registered on this board, and I'll figure out how to work the ban function.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_GoodK

Re: Board Lawsuits

Post by _GoodK »

harmony wrote:
GoodK wrote:By the way, your home address is now positively in cyberspace.


Not anymore, it's not. Put it up again or any other personal information about anyone registered on this board, and I'll figure out how to work the ban function.



Ummm... yeah it is.


I doubt that Dr. Shades will approve of you banning me.


You're sad harmony.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Board Lawsuits

Post by _harmony »

GoodK wrote:
harmony wrote:Not anymore, it's not. Put it up again or any other personal information about anyone registered on this board, and I'll figure out how to work the ban function.



Ummm... yeah it is.


I doubt that Dr. Shades will approve of you banning me.


You're sad harmony.


I may be sad, but you're pathetic. And don't count on Shades being in your corner.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_GoodK

Re: Board Lawsuits

Post by _GoodK »

harmony wrote:I may be sad, but you're pathetic. And don't count on Shades being in your corner.


No. You're pathetic. And clearly starving for male attention.
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Re: Board Lawsuits

Post by _truth dancer »

I am asking for some better boundaries to help make this nonsense much less frequent.


Maybe we as posters could take it upon ourselves to act more decently, refrain from abusing or otherwise taunting our fellow board participants, and stop being rude and cruel while trying to hurt the personal lives of others?

Just an idea... :wink:

~td~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
Post Reply