Pokatator wrote:Personally, Dr. Dan, I think that your particular post in the other thread was in extremely bad form and taste.
Yes because whatever point Dan was attempting to make, it need not involve Eric since Eric has not been abusive to Dan nor writing lies on the board about him. So why single him out. It seems that Dan for quite some time and crocket as well have both on this board been quite abusive to Eric in their posts.
What I question is why you picked GoodK to make your example and why you chose a scenario of mental illness, jail, abuse of women and psych institutions?
I question this because you know his father and family, which is basically inside information. I question whether you deliberately chose the issues you did because you knew they would set GoodK off. I think you knew exactly what you were doing and you have this humor thing of yours down to an art. You should be proud.
It shows quite a mean streak in Dan. I don't think it's out of character, he does have quite a mean streak.
While I don't condone any side in this snafu I wish you could have acted as the cognizant professional here, but you didn't. You chose a low blow on a younger man you have inside information on.
From way back when Eric wrote a post critical of his step dad's belief that priesthood blessings work, and Dan got involved by informing the step dad, Dan has not only meddled inappropriately in the real life affairs of others but he seems to be quite abusively generally against Eric in many posts. I think it's quite sad, given that Eric has been through quite a lot. Sent away from home, from family (mom and sister) from friends, that alone is extremely abusive to a place which used behavior modification techniques which are commonly known to be also be quite abusive. And he was sent there for minor issues. So I find it extremely insensitive of Dan and Crocket, the way they are so unempathetic and infact extremely cruel.