rcrocket wrote:The cite is confused, in the sense that the "notes" do not appear in the original publication -- an odd way to present evidence.
I stated in my original post "Uncle Dale notes.....". I am happy to accept his scholarship, I am not claiming any original analysis here.
rcrocket wrote:Nonetheless, as I have pointed out in the past, the Brotherton affidavit is highly suspect, as it was prepared at John C. Bennett's request and probably drafted by him. (Saintly Scoundrel, p. 105.) He reproduced it at City of the Saints, p. 236, and it the affidavit said: "you are at liberty to make what use of them you may think best." But the affidavit is written in John C. Bennett's writing style.
When we are looking for indicia of the misdemeanors of a despised religion, that which is contained in the four corners of an apostate is to be immediately distrusted -- a sort of axiom which applies to Origen's and Tertulllian's descriptions of the pagans.
So, what you are saying is that the word of an apostate can not be used as evidence?
What nonsense!
By refusing to be seduced and blackmailed by BY and JSjr, and by going public, Martha showed extraordinary strength and moral fiber for her time. After that she is hardly going to be taken in by Joseph's bitter abortionist/scapegoat.
Do you also reject the evidence of victims of child abuse on the grounds that they have demonstrated themselves to be opposed to pedophilia and are therefore biased against pedophiles?
Do you have any evidence that Martha would lie for JCB?
Did she gain anything from it other than vilification and the sundering of her family?
Sarah Pratt also managed to provide evidence of JSjr's modus operandi, acknowledging JCB's resemblance to pond scum, while retaining her ability to determine how likely it was that he was telling the truth based on the context and his motivation at the time.
JCB was a scum-bucket no doubt. But, after his fall from grace, he had every reason to make use of the most powerful weapon he had: the truth.