Sethbag wrote:To paraphrase Thomas Payne, what Joseph Smith was told by God was revelation. What we were told by Joseph Smith was hearsay. Consider this hearsay as you would consider any other hearsay.
If Emma Smith couldn't trust Joseph to keep his pants on while she was out of town on a shopping trip, couldn't trust him not to "marry" and boink the hired help, or her best friends, or the wives of some of his most prominent followers, then why should we trust him when he said he saw God?
Joseph Smith had an established pattern of lying, deceitful dealing, and acting out in secret (in the shadows). In any other context and with any other person (aside from, perhaps, other high ranking Mormon leaders), this pattern would, I think, cause even the most devout true believer to, at least, question the person's credibility, particularly if this person made rather extraordinary claims for himself.
Yet in Joseph Smith's case, such behavior is overlooked, excused, or positioned as "training wheels" for his Prophetic calling. More, believers will often flip the issue around and question the credibility (not to mention morality) of skeptics for daring to question Smith's credibility.
An example of how dogmatic religious thinking warps an otherwise reasonable person's common sense and moral compass.