DonBradley wrote:Chris and I will be arguing just the opposite in our paper...
Hi Don,
Any information as to where and when your paper will be published?
Thanks!
Eyewitnesses of the Papyri and Memory
-
_Dwight Frye
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 666
- Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 6:22 pm
Re: Eyewitnesses of the Papyri and Memory
Hi Don,
Any information as to where and when your paper will be published?
Thanks!
"Christian anti-Mormons are no different than that wonderful old man down the street who turns out to be a child molester." - Obiwan, nutjob Mormon apologist - Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:25 pm
-
_DonBradley
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:58 am
Re: Eyewitnesses of the Papyri and Memory
Hey Again Will,
Well, just by way of encouragement I would say, never underestimate the power of a group of devoted Lilliputians working on a common problem. Even the biggest computer is built chip by chip...
Despite Chris's long posting on MBs, I actually don't think you do know much or most of our evidence for Abraham 2:18f being a Nauvoo production. So maybe we're both in for surprises...!
In any case, I'll look forward to the full presentation of the case you describe. May the best ideas win.
Don
Well, just by way of encouragement I would say, never underestimate the power of a group of devoted Lilliputians working on a common problem. Even the biggest computer is built chip by chip...
Despite Chris's long posting on MBs, I actually don't think you do know much or most of our evidence for Abraham 2:18f being a Nauvoo production. So maybe we're both in for surprises...!
In any case, I'll look forward to the full presentation of the case you describe. May the best ideas win.
Don
-
_William Schryver
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1671
- Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:58 pm
Re: Eyewitnesses of the Papyri and Memory
DB:
I have long since concluded that the debate will most certainly outlive us. Same with the various debates swirling around the Book of Mormon. In fact, it almost seems to me--at times--as though the whole thing was meticulously set up to produce precisely the quasi-equilibrium between arguments pro and con that we see (well, I doubt both regard it in those terms, but you get the idea); thereby placing the question of historicity/authenticity/divine origins/etc. in a purely metaphysical setting. Which, I suppose, is where it ought to remain.
OK, back to the freshly-turned soil I love so much ...
In any case, I'll look forward to the full presentation of the case you describe. May the best ideas win.
I have long since concluded that the debate will most certainly outlive us. Same with the various debates swirling around the Book of Mormon. In fact, it almost seems to me--at times--as though the whole thing was meticulously set up to produce precisely the quasi-equilibrium between arguments pro and con that we see (well, I doubt both regard it in those terms, but you get the idea); thereby placing the question of historicity/authenticity/divine origins/etc. in a purely metaphysical setting. Which, I suppose, is where it ought to remain.
OK, back to the freshly-turned soil I love so much ...
... every man walketh in his own way, and after the image of his own god, whose image is in the likeness of the world, and whose substance is that of an idol ...