Official origins of the temple garment?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Rollo Tomasi
_Emeritus
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:27 pm

Re: Official origins of the temple garment?

Post by _Rollo Tomasi »

mormonmessages wrote:What is the official story about the origins of the temple garment?

Are the changes to the temple garments included in the lessons?

I know of no "official story," but below is a link to Deconstructor's page with a pretty good history of LDS garments:

http://www.i4m.com/think/temples/mormon-garments.htm
"Moving beyond apologist persuasion, LDS polemicists furiously (and often fraudulently) attack any non-traditional view of Mormonism. They don't mince words -- they mince the truth."

-- Mike Quinn, writing of the FARMSboys, in "Early Mormonism and the Magic World View," p. x (Rev. ed. 1998)
_zzyzx
_Emeritus
Posts: 1042
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:31 pm

Re: Official origins of the temple garment?

Post by _zzyzx »

If the garment was not 'reintroduced' until 1842, why wait until then? Why not at the Kirtland Temple? A House of the Lord where Temple Work could be done, why not garments and the full ritual?

How many remnants of Garments are found in the graves and ruins of early Christians and the peoples of Earlier dispensations where 'the fulness of the Gospel' was given? Surely somewhere the garment with the markings turns up?
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their shoes. That way when you do criticize them you'll be a mile away and you'll have their shoes.
_mentalgymnast

Re: Official origins of the temple garment?

Post by _mentalgymnast »

mormonmessages wrote:What is the official story about the origins of the temple garment?

Are the changes to the temple garments included in the lessons?


Here is a good place to start:

http://en.fairmormon.org/Temple_garments

Also:


The Nauvoo "old style" Garment (c1842-1975) was partially described by Ebenezer Robinson (who had once served as the editor of the Mormon newspaper Times and Seasons) in his periodical The Return Vol. II (April 1890), 252:

"As early as 1843 a secret order was established in Nauvoo, called the HOLY ORDER, the members of which were of both sexes, in which, we are credibly informed, scenes were enacted representing the garden of Eden, and that the members of the order were provided with a peculiar under garment called a robe. 'It was made in one piece. On the right breast is a square, on the left a compass, in the center a small hole, and on the knee a large hole.' This was the description of the garment as given to the writer in Nauvoo, in Joseph Smith's life time. It was claimed that while they wore this 'robe' no harm could befall them."

Increase McGee Van Dusen, who described the Nauvoo temple endowment ceremony in 1847, mentioned that the Garment was a "tight fit" and only remembered the Priesthood marks of the square and compass-mistakenly stating the latter was on the knee. A description attributed to Elizabeth Warren Allred, who had been hired by the Prophet Joseph Smith to cut out the garment pattern, intimated that the Marks of the Holy Priesthood were originally stitched in red:

"It was while they were living in Nauvoo that the Prophet came to my mother, who was a seamstress by trade, and told her that he had seen the Angel Moroni with the garments on, and asked her to assist in cutting out the garments. They spread unbleached muslin out on the table and he told her how to cut it out. She had to cut the third pair, however, before he said it was satisfactory. She told the prophet that there would be sufficient cloth from the knee to the ankle to make a pair of sleeves, but he told her he wanted as few seams as possible and that there would be sufficient whole cloth to cut the sleeve without piecing. The first garments were made of unbleached muslin and bound with turkey red and were without collars. Later on the prophet decided he would rather have them bound with white. Sister Emma Smith, the Prophet's wife, proposed that they have a collar on as she thought they would look more finished, but at first the prophet did not have the collars on them. After Emma Smith had made the little collars which were not visible from the outside of the dress, Sister Eliza R. Snow made a collar of fine white material which was worn on the outside of the dress. The garment was to reach to the ankle and the sleeves to the wrist. The marks were always the same."

(Diary of James T.S. Allred; Letter to Col. Williams; [Microfilm d.1021/f.92, end of roll #2 (July 10, 1844)] LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City).



Regards,
MG
_mentalgymnast

Re: Official origins of the temple garment?

Post by _mentalgymnast »

mentalgymnast wrote:
mormonmessages wrote:What is the official story about the origins of the temple garment?

Are the changes to the temple garments included in the lessons?


Here is a good place to start:

http://en.fairmormon.org/Temple_garments

Also:


The Nauvoo "old style" Garment (c1842-1975) was partially described by Ebenezer Robinson (who had once served as the editor of the Mormon newspaper Times and Seasons) in his periodical The Return Vol. II (April 1890), 252:

"As early as 1843 a secret order was established in Nauvoo, called the HOLY ORDER, the members of which were of both sexes, in which, we are credibly informed, scenes were enacted representing the garden of Eden, and that the members of the order were provided with a peculiar under garment called a robe. 'It was made in one piece. On the right breast is a square, on the left a compass, in the center a small hole, and on the knee a large hole.' This was the description of the garment as given to the writer in Nauvoo, in Joseph Smith's life time. It was claimed that while they wore this 'robe' no harm could befall them."

Increase McGee Van Dusen, who described the Nauvoo temple endowment ceremony in 1847, mentioned that the Garment was a "tight fit" and only remembered the Priesthood marks of the square and compass-mistakenly stating the latter was on the knee. A description attributed to Elizabeth Warren Allred, who had been hired by the Prophet Joseph Smith to cut out the garment pattern, intimated that the Marks of the Holy Priesthood were originally stitched in red:

"It was while they were living in Nauvoo that the Prophet came to my mother, who was a seamstress by trade, and told her that he had seen the Angel Moroni with the garments on, and asked her to assist in cutting out the garments. They spread unbleached muslin out on the table and he told her how to cut it out. She had to cut the third pair, however, before he said it was satisfactory. She told the prophet that there would be sufficient cloth from the knee to the ankle to make a pair of sleeves, but he told her he wanted as few seams as possible and that there would be sufficient whole cloth to cut the sleeve without piecing. The first garments were made of unbleached muslin and bound with turkey red and were without collars. Later on the prophet decided he would rather have them bound with white. Sister Emma Smith, the Prophet's wife, proposed that they have a collar on as she thought they would look more finished, but at first the prophet did not have the collars on them. After Emma Smith had made the little collars which were not visible from the outside of the dress, Sister Eliza R. Snow made a collar of fine white material which was worn on the outside of the dress. The garment was to reach to the ankle and the sleeves to the wrist. The marks were always the same."

(Diary of James T.S. Allred; Letter to Col. Williams; [Microfilm d.1021/f.92, end of roll #2 (July 10, 1844)] LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City).



Regards,
MG


by the way, mormonmessages, how much research do you do before you ask these rather lame questions? The answers are usually out there if you're willing to sweat a little bit. May I respectfully suggest that newbies, such as yourself, do a bit of your own research rather than relying upon others to do your foot work?

Regards,
MG
_Yoda

Re: Official origins of the temple garment?

Post by _Yoda »

I'm not opposed to anyone asking a sincere question. There are questions I have asked that I could have probably researched first, but knew there were folks here who had an expertise in an area I was asking about.

I am a bit confused at Mormonmessager's line of questioning, and maybe he can clarify.

In the Celestial Forum, he has participated in some threads with me, and it appears that he is a Church member, and has a fairly good grasp on LDS doctrine.

Based on what I have observed in his participation on other threads, I find the question on garments a bit odd.

MM, since you are a new poster, do you mind my asking what your affiliation with the Church is? If you are a member, how long have you been a member, and have you been through the temple?
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Official origins of the temple garment?

Post by _Jersey Girl »

liz3564 wrote:MM, since you are a new poster, do you mind my asking what your affiliation with the Church is? If you are a member, how long have you been a member, and have you been through the temple?


If I were a betting person (which I'm not) my money would be on "sock puppet" with "poser" as a second choice.

Just sayin'
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Gazelam
_Emeritus
Posts: 5659
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 am

Re: Official origins of the temple garment?

Post by _Gazelam »

Image

Notice the markings on the fringes of the clothing worn by these early christians.

Also the curse that came upon Ham was due to his stealing the garment from his Father and seeking to duplicate it without authority.
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. - Plato
_mormonmessages
_Emeritus
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:21 am

Re: Official origins of the temple garment?

Post by _mormonmessages »

liz3564 wrote:MM, since you are a new poster, do you mind my asking what your affiliation with the Church is? If you are a member, how long have you been a member, and have you been through the temple?
I am a long time member, rather not say how long for fear of being outted.


I have been through the temple.

I have doubts but I am too afraid to talk to either my wife or coworkers.

I am married to TBM wife with deep pioneer roots. I currently work for the church.
How TBM is my wife? She believes the garments came from god and that Adam and Eve wore them.

If I talk about any of my doubts, I will surely be facing a divorce and unemployment.

Someone asked why do I post these supposed easy to research questions?

To get them out there for other lurkers and the like to read. This is my only outlet to the hell that I live and work in.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: Official origins of the temple garment?

Post by _The Nehor »

mormonmessages wrote:Someone asked why do I post these supposed easy to research questions?

To get them out there for other lurkers and the like to read. This is my only outlet to the hell that I live and work in.


You're venting? Good to know.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_mormonmessages
_Emeritus
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:21 am

Re: Official origins of the temple garment?

Post by _mormonmessages »

The Nehor wrote:
mormonmessages wrote:Someone asked why do I post these supposed easy to research questions?

To get them out there for other lurkers and the like to read. This is my only outlet to the hell that I live and work in.


You're venting? Good to know.
Yeah and so?

What are you doing here?

With the amount of time you seem to spend here and the MAAD board, I'd guess you aren't married?
Post Reply