Terrestrial comments from Will Schryver thread

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Will Schryver »

harmony wrote:
Will Schryver wrote:But to return to my previous question, which you so conveniently ignored:

Why did you lie about how long my post was up before you edited it?

As can be seen quite clearly in the thread in question, the post where I allegedly used the revolting term was up for over two hours before you edited it and the places where both Rollo and I had quoted it.

So why did you lie and say it was only up for a matter of minutes? I guess you forgot that Rollo and I had quoted it, huh?

Off topic. Start another thread.

So discussion of the prime piece of evidence supporting the spurious allegations is considered "off topic?"

LOL!


ETA: You're sailing a sinking ship, dissonance. I hope you have a life jacket ...
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _wenglund »

MrStakhanovite wrote:The whole strategy here is to frame this thread as "Anti-Mormons" VS "Righteous Defenders"...


I did not know this. My aluminum foil hat must be malfunctioning because I never received the memo--which explains why I have yet to use the word 'anti-Mormon" or to try and paint the defenders as righteous. Here I thought my self-appointed role was to compliment the MD gang on their elevating human passion of character assassination.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
Last edited by Gadianton on Mon May 02, 2011 7:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _wenglund »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:Loran, Wade and Belmont,

With regards to the OP, I have this to say to all three of you.

Stand for something... besides your "side".

Jersey Girl


I didn't take a side. I just don't agree with public lynchings like this.


Contrary to SB, I have been standing up and giving an ovation for the unrivalled virtues of the pristine folks here, in taking the high road in their selective gang outrage and scortched earth approach. I am humbled by their carefully targetted culture of personal destruction, and this laudably against the vile notion of presumption of innocense, and based on the least pretense of gossip.

Who wouldn't be proud? Strident hypocrisy is what we all are striving for, but what only a few here have amazingly acheived. All we need now is for Kevin Graham to drop the ever-uplifting, though transparently disguised "f" bomb and for rockslider to honorably equate this all to menstration.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
Last edited by Gadianton on Mon May 02, 2011 5:07 pm, edited 4 times in total.
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Will Schryver »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Can someone tell me what Mr. Schryver said that made Ms. Harmony delete his comment ...

More interesting would be the answer to the following question which I have now posed twice to harmony:

Why did you lie about how long my post was up before you edited it?

As can be seen quite clearly in the thread in question, the post where I allegedly used the revolting term was up for over two hours before you edited it and the places where both Rollo and I had quoted it.

So why did you lie and say it was only up for a matter of minutes? I guess you forgot that Rollo and I had quoted it, huh?

.
.
.
You're just the homely waitress wandering from table to table here in the singlewide, hoping that someone will get drunk enough to ask you out.

It is quite tragic that some people's aspirations never rise about waiting tables at the GSTP, and angling for a cheap ride home.
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Kevin Graham »

More attacks on women or using an effeminate descriptor on this board by Mr. Schryver:


That's what makes Will's participation here so great. He keeps digging his own hole deeper but is just too stupid to realize it. He even suggests that he and the folks at the Maxwell Institute will be laughing about this tomorrow! He doesn't only speak for himself, but he claims to speak for the serious LDS scholars as well. I wonder how they feel about that.

But seriously, there is only one way to handle puny men like Will Schryver, and it isn't through reasoning. He'll never, ever admit being wrong. He has created this "us vs. them" scenario and has demanded loyalty from everyone in his tribe. Some have been dumb enough to yield to the call with fawning praise, but I suspect most are just as disgusted as we are, which explains their silence.

This tribal mentality coupled with his messiah complex prevents him from understanding that those who are disgusted with his antics are genuinely disgusted. His confirmation bias kicks in and he keeps telling himself this is all just a massive conspiracy from an opposing tribe. But we're not a tribe at all. We've all argued with each other at some point in time it seems. MsJack is an Evangelical married a Mormon, went to BYU, tries to build bridges between LDS and non-LDS, whereas most everyone else here isn't religious at all. But if you're LDS and show any kind of support for what these women are complaining about, he goes out of his way to marginalize you as a potential apostate. He has to keep creating these reasons to believe that in reality there is nothing wrong in what he has said. He tries all kinds of rationalizations too, like comparing his dozen or so "naughty" comments to his 10,000 posts over five years. The man is desperate.

Will Schryver is a proven liar. I have proved it on a number of occasions and will continue to do so. I'm not so much interested in his lies about his online social encounters, so much as I am his lies in apologetic arguments. I just find it hilarious that he actually thinks anyone thinks he is trustworthy.
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Will Schryver »

Say what you will about the tenets of the The Great and Spacious Trailer Park©, at least it's an ethos.

As far as its tenants are concerned ... well, there aren't enough rugs in this place to express how I really feel.







(I don't care who you are ... that's funny!)
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Buffalo »

Will Schryver wrote:Say what you will about the tenets of the The Great and Spacious Trailer Park©, at least it's an ethos.

As far as its tenants are concerned ... well, there aren't enough rugs in this place to express how I really feel.







(I don't care who you are ... that's funny!)


Do you plan to continue sexually harassing women in the future, or is that all behind you?
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Will Schryver »

Kevin Graham wrote:... there is only one way to handle puny men like Will Schryver ...

So you claimed ... but then you never told us the secret.

Uh, excuse me. Mark it zero. Next frame.
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_Will Schryver
_Emeritus
Posts: 438
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:12 pm

Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _Will Schryver »

Buffalo wrote:
Will Schryver wrote:Say what you will about the tenets of the The Great and Spacious Trailer Park©, at least it's an ethos.

As far as its tenants are concerned ... well, there aren't enough rugs in this place to express how I really feel.







(I don't care who you are ... that's funny!)


Do you plan to continue sexually harassing women in the future, or is that all behind you?

As long as you continue beating your wife.



(by the way, does "Buffalo" seem to think that my post he quoted constitutes "sexually harassing women"? Inquiring minds ... well, no they don't. Not really.)
I thought myself the wiser to have viewed the evidence left of such a great demise. I followed every step. But the only thing I ever learned before the journey's end was there was nothing there to learn, only something to forget.
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schryver

Post by _wenglund »

May I compliment the mob for remaining so calm (as Buffalo pointed out) during this weekend-long lynching. You have been the picture of tranquility as you dispense the fast mounting pages of spite. The sensitivity training has certainly paid off, and your respect for the rules of the celestial forum is a credit to your high character.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
Post Reply