New angle for Book of Abraham apologists to pursue

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: New angle for Book of Abraham apologists to pursue

Post by _Chap »

Wisdom Seeker wrote:
Chap wrote:Right. 'Long-lost'. An angel took them back to heaven ...


Funny you should bring that up. At one point he stated that the reason the golden-plates were taken from man was because a scholarly translation would not match what was given to Joseph by God through the Urim and Thummim. God did not want his church looking foolish.


On another thread ('Middle Way') we hear that you will get ex'd if you dare to try to use your mental agility to help you stay in the church you were born in and whose members you want to continue to serve, despite your doubts.

On this thread we hear that you can babble away as inanely and ignorantly as you like without contradiction or criticism, so long as your intention is to convey the message that The Church Is True.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: New angle for Book of Abraham apologists to pursue

Post by _Kishkumen »

Chap wrote:On this thread we hear that you can babble away as inanely and ignorantly as you like without contradiction or criticism, so long as your intention is to convey the message that The Church Is True.


Do you have a problem with that or something?

LOL.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Infymus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1584
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:10 pm

Re: New angle for Book of Abraham apologists to pursue

Post by _Infymus »

Name the guy please.
_Baker
_Emeritus
Posts: 490
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:01 am

Re: New angle for Book of Abraham apologists to pursue

Post by _Baker »

Geez, why not just say that they've been printing the wrong manuscript all along?

The Book of Abraham in the Mormon canon is really the handiwork of one of the scribes that was inadvertently mistaken for Smith's manuscript. Joseph, besought with myriad troubles of his own, decided against correcting the error in the Times and Seasons. After all, it was only much later that the mistaken version was placed into the canon. It's not like Joseph could have known how bad the error would get, I mean it's not like he was a prophet or anything.
"I have more to boast of than ever any man had. I am the only man that has ever been able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam. ... Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus ever did it. I boast that no man ever did such a work as I." - Joseph Smith, 1844
_Kevin Graham
_Emeritus
Posts: 13037
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 6:44 pm

Re: New angle for Book of Abraham apologists to pursue

Post by _Kevin Graham »

Nelson was handled long ago. Time to update those apologetics.


Yes, by the Tanners, who called him out for deception after Nibley recommended his services as if he were a legitimate Egyptologist!

Isn't it funny how those apostates have more discernment than Church leaders, and especially the Church membership in general? Makes you wonder who is really being open minded and rational.
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: New angle for Book of Abraham apologists to pursue

Post by _sock puppet »

Chap wrote:Right. 'Long-lost'. An angel took them back to heaven ...
Wisdom Seeker wrote:Funny you should bring that up. At one point he stated that the reason the golden-plates were taken from man was because a scholarly translation would not match what was given to Joseph by God through the Urim and Thummim. God did not want his church looking foolish.
Chap wrote:On another thread ('Middle Way') we hear that you will get ex'd if you dare to try to use your mental agility to help you stay in the church you were born in and whose members you want to continue to serve, despite your doubts.

On this thread we hear that you can babble away as inanely and ignorantly as you like without contradiction or criticism, so long as your intention is to convey the message that The Church Is True.

It's a marvelous work and a wonder.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: New angle for Book of Abraham apologists to pursue

Post by _harmony »

Chap wrote: Of course the fact that they did not realize that a jackal-headed Anubis instead of a human priest contradicts the Book of Abraham just shows how few of them had an actual familiarity with the text in which their faith had been re-affirmed ...


Surely you jest. You mean we're actually supposed to read that stuff? I mean... the prophet reads it, so we don't have to.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: New angle for Book of Abraham apologists to pursue

Post by _just me »

I need a damn laugh button. You guys crack me up!
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_Wisdom Seeker
_Emeritus
Posts: 991
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:55 am

Re: New angle for Book of Abraham apologists to pursue

Post by _Wisdom Seeker »

Infymus wrote:Name the guy please.


The lecturer who gave the presentation?
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Re: New angle for Book of Abraham apologists to pursue

Post by _wenglund »

I am in-debted to all the "real" Egyptologists who have weighed in on this thread.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
"Why should I care about being consistent?" --Mister Scratch (MD, '08)
Post Reply