Hello,
An interesting dialogue with Ms. KA...
Kimberly,
Actually, the comments were made here. I'm much more "respectable" when I post on the MAD board. You know, when in Rome ...
So. Mr. Schryver "acts more respectable" when he knows he's under more scrutiny... Hrm... Anyway, you're correct in concluding that I'm not the "Peter Priesthood" that some people have tried to paint me as. I have several "rough edges," so to speak. And, frankly, I'm not that interested in having them smoothed over at this point in my life. There are enough colorless Mormons without me adding to their number.
Ok. So Mr. Schryver admits that he's a little "rough edged", and hence his use of vivid sexually tinged homosexual imagery. KA Said:
Now, if I only knew what Silentkid meant by spunk toast...
Believe me, you don't want to know. Contrary to Kevin's suggestions that I was not familiar with the more vulgar connotations for "circle jerk" back when I first used the phrase --
I was.
So, Mr. Schryver admits that he knew exactly what he was saying and that it was meant in its sexual connotation.I guess I simply trusted that its evolved meaning would have superseded the original in the minds of the readers here. In retrospect (and having read Polygamy Porter's and Schmo's posts, I'm sure you'll agree) I can now see that I was making an incorrect assumption. In a place where
masturbation has attained unto the status of the first fundamental right of self-expression, one should also assume that all language will be reduced to its lowest common denominator.
So. Mr. Schryver "assumed" that his use of a sexually tinged homosexual comment would be "elevated" to the idea that it's just a bunch of guys high-fiving each other was misconstrued even though he himself admitted that he's an "edgy" guy who knew the most commonly accepted description of "circle jerk".
Uh huh. I suppose his next explanation of "limp biscuit" is that he was really meaning that someone simply was proffering a flaccid argument, or some such nonsense.V/R
Dr. Cam