How many posters on MD were once apologists?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: How many posters on MD were once apologists?

Post by _sock puppet »

Hoops wrote:

Do you know for a fact that invisible fairies don't sharpen your eyelashes with tiny whetstones while you sleep? If not, you need to allow for the possibility.


Can you ever discuss religion/spirituality without being condescending?

I am not sure anyone on either side of the believing chasm can do so when addressing issues with those on the other side.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: How many posters on MD were once apologists?

Post by _Buffalo »

mentalgymnast wrote:
That explains things.

Regards,
MG


Wonderful. Now, do you have a response to my question regarding the relative weight of evidence for the existence God vs invisible fairies?

A trite question, I know, but one theists still can't seem to answer.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: How many posters on MD were once apologists?

Post by _Hoops »

I am not sure anyone on either side of the believing chasm can do so when addressing issues with those on the other side.
I do all the time.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: How many posters on MD were once apologists?

Post by _Buffalo »

Hoops wrote:
I am not sure anyone on either side of the believing chasm can do so when addressing issues with those on the other side.
I do all the time.


I appreciate your respect for my lack of supernatural beliefs.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: How many posters on MD were once apologists?

Post by _MsJack »

EAllusion wrote:!

Mmm, you know, I just reviewed the conversation on my blog from 2009 where he told me all about this, and he didn't say he was an unbeliever now per se. Just that he was inactive and had been studying Buddhism and seemed to like it.

Sorry if I misrepresented you, wherever you are, Kevin. The conversation was over two years old.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_mentalgymnast

Re: How many posters on MD were once apologists?

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Buffalo wrote:
mentalgymnast wrote:
That explains things.

Regards,
MG


Wonderful. Now, do you have a response to my question regarding the relative weight of evidence for the existence God vs invisible fairies?

A trite question, I know, but one theists still can't seem to answer.


If fairies are invisible, or non-existent, to begin with, how would one do a side by side evidence comparison with a divine being who is said, at least according to LDS belief, to be corporeal and has actually appeared to mankind and given direct instructions/knowledge?

Regards,
MG
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: How many posters on MD were once apologists?

Post by _Hoops »


I appreciate your respect for my lack of supernatural beliefs.


Actually, I do respect them. I think you're wrong and think that you hold to your beliefs just as emotionally as you criticize others for doing with theirs. All within the guise of appealing to evidence. I remain hopeful that you may consider that some people arrive at their supernatural beliefs in a reasonable way. I am doubting, however.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: How many posters on MD were once apologists?

Post by _Buffalo »

mentalgymnast wrote:
If fairies are invisible, or non-existent, to begin with, how would one do a side by side evidence comparison with a divine being who is said, at least according to LDS belief, to be corporeal and has actually appeared to mankind and given direct instructions/knowledge?

Regards,
MG


Some people believe in fairies. Some people claim to have seen them. Neither the fairy believers nor the God believers can come up with any evidence, though.

These people who claim to have seen god - what evidence do they provide to back up that claim?
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: How many posters on MD were once apologists?

Post by _sock puppet »

Buffalo wrote:
mentalgymnast wrote:
That explains things.

Regards,
MG


Wonderful. Now, do you have a response to my question regarding the relative weight of evidence for the existence God vs invisible fairies?

A trite question, I know, but one theists still can't seem to answer.

Invisible fairies only cause the bosoms of little children to burn.

God causes the bosoms of Mormon adults to burn.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: How many posters on MD were once apologists?

Post by _Buffalo »

Hoops wrote:

I appreciate your respect for my lack of supernatural beliefs.


Actually, I do respect them. I think you're wrong and think that you hold to your beliefs just as emotionally as you criticize others for doing with theirs. All within the guise of appealing to evidence. I remain hopeful that you may consider that some people arrive at their supernatural beliefs in a reasonable way. I am doubting, however.


You can speculate all you like about my emotional state, but the evidence is all in my favor. :)

I don't think there is such a think as arriving at supernatural beliefs in a reasonable way. You can't have supernatural beliefs without magical thinking, and magical thinking is an irrational state of mind.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Post Reply