Wives of Joseph Smith Sealing Question
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 22508
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm
Wives of Joseph Smith Sealing Question
When the wives of Joseph Smith remarried after his death, were the sealings to Joseph cancelled or were new sealings simply added to Brigham Young and others?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:53 pm
Re: Wives of Joseph Smith Sealing Question
I believe the new sealings (to Brigham, Heber and others) were for time only so the sealings to Joseph, for time and all eternity, were not cancelled.
What has always confused me is why most of his plural wives were sealed to Joseph by proxy after his death?
Since the sealing power was given to Joseph in 1836 why the need for proxy sealings? Were they not properly sealed to him while he was alive?
What has always confused me is why most of his plural wives were sealed to Joseph by proxy after his death?
Since the sealing power was given to Joseph in 1836 why the need for proxy sealings? Were they not properly sealed to him while he was alive?
It is my province to teach to the Church what the doctrine is. It is your province to echo what I say or to remain silent.
Bruce R. McConkie
Bruce R. McConkie
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 3542
- Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm
Re: Wives of Joseph Smith Sealing Question
moksha wrote:When the wives of Joseph Smith remarried after his death, were the sealings to Joseph cancelled or were new sealings simply added to Brigham Young and others?
My ancestor was sealed to Joseph Smith (at the insistence of Brigham Young) shortly after his death. She was then immediately married (as a plural wife) to Fredrick Walter Cox for time only. There is debate as to whether or not she was married to Joseph during his life.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 22508
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm
Re: Wives of Joseph Smith Sealing Question
Willy Law wrote:Since the sealing power was given to Joseph in 1836 why the need for proxy sealings? Were they not properly sealed to him while he was alive?
Perhaps either Emma kept an eagle eye on the comings and going of the sealing place or there was a change in the ceremony requiring it be done at an Altar.
It surprises me that Brigham Young settled for time without eternity.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 18195
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am
Re: Wives of Joseph Smith Sealing Question
moksha wrote:Willy Law wrote:Since the sealing power was given to Joseph in 1836 why the need for proxy sealings? Were they not properly sealed to him while he was alive?
Perhaps either Emma kept an eagle eye on the comings and going of the sealing place or there was a change in the ceremony requiring it be done at an Altar.
It surprises me that Brigham Young settled for time without eternity.
Doesn't surprise me.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.