LDS Nursery lessons changed because people were leaving?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Yoda

Re: LDS Nursery lessons changed because people were leaving?

Post by _Yoda »

Quasimodo wrote:
Simon Belmont wrote:I was in the nursery for many years, and what The Nehor said was basically right. The kids play with toys, you share a short "message" and that's it.


As a student? It must have been frustrating not graduating with your friends. How old were you when you finally got out?


LOL! I think that sometimes we all act like we're still in Nursery! :-)

Actually, I wouldn't mind getting my snack and an afternoon nap!
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: LDS Nursery lessons changed because people were leaving?

Post by _harmony »

Some Schmo wrote:But no parent is perfect, and if you allow your children to be indoctrinated, or even exposed to indoctrination in a demonstrably false religion, then that's an area where your imperfection as a parent reveals itself. I don't know how to sugarcoat that, and I'd like to break it to you as gently as possible because I genuinely like you, liz. But it is what it is.


You don't get to decide how other parents raise their children. You may not agree, but your worldview is no more psychologically healthy or sociologically sound than any other parent who is trying to instill a sense of values in their child.

Nobody died and made you Head Parent.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: LDS Nursery lessons changed because people were leaving?

Post by _Some Schmo »

harmony wrote: You don't get to decide how other parents raise their children.

Don't remember claiming I did.

harmony wrote:You may not agree, but your worldview is no more psychologically healthy or sociologically sound than any other parent who is trying to instill a sense of values in their child.

Says you. When I consider the source of this statement, I find it difficult to be moved by it.

Suggesting that indoctrinating a child with BS is akin to "trying to instill a sense of values in their child" is like suggesting letting your kid watch MTV is "trying to find a good babysitter."

harmony wrote:Nobody died and made you Head Parent.

More's the pity.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Yoda

Re: LDS Nursery lessons changed because people were leaving?

Post by _Yoda »

..letting your kid watch MTV is "trying to find a good babysitter."


http://adage.com/images/bin/image/right ... 1269873561
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: LDS Nursery lessons changed because people were leaving?

Post by _harmony »

Some Schmo wrote:
harmony wrote: You don't get to decide how other parents raise their children.

Don't remember claiming I did.


If only...

harmony wrote:You may not agree, but your worldview is no more psychologically healthy or sociologically sound than any other parent who is trying to instill a sense of values in their child.

Says you. When I consider the source of this statement, I find it difficult to be moved by it.


Which still doesn't make me wrong.

Suggesting that indoctrinating a child with BS is akin to "trying to instill a sense of values in their child" is like suggesting letting your kid watch MTV is "trying to find a good babysitter."


And yet generations upon generations have done it just this way. And the species still lives on. How can this be? Oh wait... yeah... because it works.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: LDS Nursery lessons changed because people were leaving?

Post by _Buffalo »

harmony wrote:
And yet generations upon generations have done it just this way. And the species still lives on. How can this be? Oh wait... yeah... because it works.


Have done it what way? The way they're doing it now in nursery and primary?
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: LDS Nursery lessons changed because people were leaving?

Post by _harmony »

Buffalo wrote:
harmony wrote:
And yet generations upon generations have done it just this way. And the species still lives on. How can this be? Oh wait... yeah... because it works.


Have done it what way? The way they're doing it now in nursery and primary?


Parents have taught their children the values they wanted them to have.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: LDS Nursery lessons changed because people were leaving?

Post by _Buffalo »

harmony wrote:Parents have taught their children the values they wanted them to have.


Well, yes, that's true. But I'm not sure how that's meaningful to the point being discussed - I think the topic is more hard-core, rigid religious indoctrination.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: LDS Nursery lessons changed because people were leaving?

Post by _Some Schmo »

harmony wrote: Which still doesn't make me wrong.

Nope, the content of what you wrote makes you wrong despite your assertions to the contrary.

harmony wrote:
Suggesting that indoctrinating a child with BS is akin to "trying to instill a sense of values in their child" is like suggesting letting your kid watch MTV is "trying to find a good babysitter."


And yet generations upon generations have done it just this way. And the species still lives on. How can this be? Oh wait... yeah... because it works.

LOL... Oh yeah, because our species hasn't gone extinct by it means it's working. Do you still wonder why I find your comments dubious?

Generations upon generations of kids have been beaten by their parents too, and the species still lives on. How can this be?

Oh yeah, because our ancestors weren't as enlightened as we are... but we can still improve upon what they did. Tradition isn't exactly the best way to determine what we should and shouldn't do.

Generations upon generations of people owned slaves. Does that mean it worked? I suppose. Our species is still around. According to harmony logic, that means slavery is the way to go.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Yoda

Re: LDS Nursery lessons changed because people were leaving?

Post by _Yoda »

Buffalo wrote:
harmony wrote:Parents have taught their children the values they wanted them to have.


Well, yes, that's true. But I'm not sure how that's meaningful to the point being discussed - I think the topic is more hard-core, rigid religious indoctrination.


The question on the table is...

Do you feel that parents who allow their kids to attend Primary and Nursery are abusing their children?

Schmo believes they are.

I believe they are not.

It goes back to whether or not you believe that LDS indoctrination is abusive.

Schmo has actually taken it a step further. He believes that ALL religious indoctrination is abusive.

To me, the term, "abusive", is a pretty strong adjective.

I could possibly go along with...."maybe not such a good idea in some cases"....but "abusive"....No. We agree to disagree on that point.

(I still like you, though, Schmo. LOL)
Post Reply