The New Allowable Sin

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_bcspace
_Emeritus
Posts: 18534
Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:48 pm

Re: The New Allowable Sin

Post by _bcspace »

It's interesting that you tend to be overly cautious about making judgments about church leaders' actions, but you're quite happy to condemn "apostates" without a second thought.


That's because there is almost always clear evidence against apostates.
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
_DaKing
_Emeritus
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:42 am

Re: The New Allowable Sin

Post by _DaKing »

I can say that the husband of my wife's college roommate did admit to the bishop that he had been naked in the same room on at least 3 occasions with the other woman but that "nothing" happened. How can you been naked in the same room and also be carrying on a secret relationship for 3 years and have "nothing" happen.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: The New Allowable Sin

Post by _Themis »

DaKing wrote:I can say that the husband of my wife's college roommate did admit to the bishop that he had been naked in the same room on at least 3 occasions with the other woman but that "nothing" happened. How can you been naked in the same room and also be carrying on a secret relationship for 3 years and have "nothing" happen.


He may be lying, but the bishop can only go on what he says or evidence that implicates him on a more serious violation of church rules.
42
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: The New Allowable Sin

Post by _zeezrom »

DaKing,

Maybe nothing of *consequence* happened. Likely, she wasn't impressed by his naked body. You can't count it if she didn't find heaven in the experience.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: The New Allowable Sin

Post by _Themis »

bcspace wrote:
It's interesting that you tend to be overly cautious about making judgments about church leaders' actions, but you're quite happy to condemn "apostates" without a second thought.


That's because there is almost always clear evidence against apostates.


The real difference is the ability to see other POV's. Those who have this ability tend to be much more open minded, while those who don't tend to be very close minded. Unfortunately I haven't seen you demonstrate this ability very well.
42
_DaKing
_Emeritus
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:42 am

Re: The New Allowable Sin

Post by _DaKing »

zeezrom wrote:DaKing,

Maybe nothing of *consequence* happened. Likely, she wasn't impressed by his naked body. You can't count it if she didn't find heaven in the experience.


So it only counts if she say's "Oh God!" during the encounter. :)

bcspace wrote:Only hearing the woman's side of the story second hand so we can only speculate. It is true that Bishops are different from person to person, but it is also true that they need some evidence and/or a confession above and beyond a he said she said sort of thing. In any case, it is likely you will never get enough information to accurately and correctly judge this case as confidences will be kept.


I respect your position but I can assure you that both of these women are deeply hurt by what their husbands did and were deeply disappointed that nothing happened. They both were very strong in their church. One ended up divorcing her husband and has left the church. The other is seriously considering it but because she stopped going to school and worked to put her husband though school and then became a stay at home mom, she is now faced with no job skills in a poor economy. She is scared of what will happen if she leaves him. A bad situation for anyone to be in let alone to be a newly divorce mom with 4 kids at home.
_Runtu
_Emeritus
Posts: 16721
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 5:06 am

Re: The New Allowable Sin

Post by _Runtu »

DaKing wrote:I respect your position but I can assure you that both of these women are deeply hurt by what their husbands did and were deeply disappointed that nothing happened. They both were very strong in their church. One ended up divorcing her husband and has left the church. The other is seriously considering it but because she stopped going to school and worked to put her husband though school and then became a stay at home mom, she is now faced with no job skills in a poor economy. She is scared of what will happen if she leaves him. A bad situation for anyone to be in let alone to be a newly divorce mom with 4 kids at home.


I've known enough people who have been badly treated by church leaders over the years, but it seems to me that bishops are human and make mistakes, often really bad, stupid mistakes. My father taught us to expect failures and mistakes from our leaders, and my sister and I have never been disappointed.
Runtu's Rincón

If you just talk, I find that your mouth comes out with stuff. -- Karl Pilkington
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: The New Allowable Sin

Post by _Dr. Shades »

DaKing wrote:How can you been naked in the same room and also be carrying on a secret relationship for 3 years and have "nothing" happen.

Simple. She was a painter, and he was just modeling for her.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Patriarchal gripe
_Emeritus
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:10 pm

Re: The New Allowable Sin

Post by _Patriarchal gripe »

If these men held the Melch PH, they would not be "dealt" with by their Bishops. It would have been a Stake Disciplinary Council. Discipline can only be administered to men by the big shots.
_Polygamy-Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8091
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:07 am

Re: The New Allowable Sin

Post by _Polygamy-Porter »

I thought that the Lord® looked upon sin with the least degree of allowance?

Regardless of why the men had sex with someone other than their wife, sex outside of marriage, last I checked the LDS rule book, is a SIN.

I just don't understand why the bishop is allowed to decide the degree of allowance in something that is cut and dried sin.

Is the wife somehow to blame for her husband extramarital activities?
New name: Boaz
The most viewed "ignored" poster in Shady Acres® !
Post Reply