MrStakhanovite wrote:Daniel Peterson wrote:But they would also be subject to some obvious criticisms: What about the believers in Jesus who lived and died (sometimes as martyrs) prior to the creeds and councils?
Grandfathered in I imagine.
But on what logically coherent basis?
MrStakhanovite wrote:Daniel Peterson wrote:What about the bishops who were outvoted at Nicea, etc.?
Like Arius? Heretics. All of them.
In fact, Arius is often regarded as the
archheretic,
par excellence.
However, heresy is one thing, and non-Christianity quite another. If it were not, the concept of
"Christian heresy" would be unintelligible. But it's not.
Arius was never, to the best of my knowledge, held to be a "non-Christian" by his contemporaries, and he's certainly not regarded as a "non-Christian" by modern scholars:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AriusMrStakhanovite wrote:Daniel Peterson wrote:What about the non-Chalcedonian confessions? If they have ever been dismissed as non-Christians, whether by their contemporaries or by modern scholars, I've not seen it.
I was under the impression that a confession lays out a denominational requirement for membership, but the seven ecumenical councils produce creeds, which determine the requirements for membership into the Christian faith.
Sorry for the confusion. I was using the term
confession as a synonym for
denomination.
At any rate, my point was and is that there are plenty of ancient eastern Christian sects who did not sign onto one or more of the supposedly "ecumenical" creeds -- and that they are never considered "non-Christian," whether by their ancient contemporaries or by informed modern writers.
MrStakhanovite wrote:But I’m familiar enough with the Monophysite /Miaphysite furor that I don’t think it is implausible to say churches like the Coptic Church isn’t “Christian”, given how their Christology has an impact salvation.
Wow. I think it would be extraordinarily odd to declare the Copts of Egypt "non-Christian." Any definition of
Christianity that did so would have to be regarded as eccentric, to say the least of it.
MrStakhanovite wrote:for what it's worth, I don’t really support the position I brought up (I think Mormons are as Christian as The Pope or Martin Luther), but that seems to be how many seem to justify their labeling Mormons, Jehovah Witnesses, and other movements as “Non-Christian”.
Okay. Got it.