harmony wrote:If you think the gospel = the church, you don't get "it" at all.
Nice try, Harmony. I've been pretty clear on this, not that I expect anyone to read my posts out of obligation, but rest assured I do not think the gospel=the Church.
Rambo wrote:Start asking apologists doubting questions and you will see how rude they can be.
Nice try, Rambo. I don't think you have a clue what I've been up to over the years. Granted I haven't done much of that here, but I've done it many times in many venues.
Buffalo wrote:Anyway, I'm not convinced you allow yourself to rationally look at these issues - you always seem to favor that which is more faith promoting over that which is most probable and which best fits the evidence. But, like I say, I think you're a cool cat anyway.
That's cool and quite nice, Buffalo. I admit at first you seemed quite annoying to me, but not so much any more. As we grow we learn to appreciate others. I'm also not convinced you allow yourself to rationally look at these issues either. Many of the examples you use in your critiques are just going overboard.
Themis wrote:I'm hopping you don't think that about people like Runtu.
I certainly didn't have Runtu in mind. To be fair to Runtu he has apologized for every thing, I can think of, that he ever did to me. I realize it takes a big man to do that--particularly since I'm so annonymous and, frankly, ineffective in these conversations. I mean very little int the game and its nice that even I am thought of enough by someone to warrant an apology. He's definitely a good person.