MrStakhanovite wrote:stemelbow wrote:So the hate showed up when Liz brought up a controversial poster and then cross posted about this elsewhere? A'ight.
To which, I could have simply said, “ Yes Stem.”
stemelbow wrote:Well then my mistake. from my perspective its an "either way" thing. To you adding "a controversial poster" in there makes a big diff. I don't see it.
by the way, what exactly is wrong with Liz bringing this poster up elsewhere?
MrStakhanovite wrote:
Let me help you out there cowboy,
Liz likes drama, so she decided to post a farewell thread about a controversial poster who has gone out of his way to be a gigantic douche to people like LDST, what better way to get people to say things that are gossip worthy?
After starting said thread, Liz flounces off to NOM-Utopia, where people pretend the LDS Church is gay friendly and pluralistic, so she can link drama thread with an appropriate “LOL” to signal the start of commentary by a virtual parade of crucified messiahs.
The icing on this two layered cake, is now Liz gets to dole out invitations to her clubhouse. It’s similar to MAD banning someone, then continuing the conversation one sided.
The whole thing, from start to finish, is for entertainment, and nothing else. That is the sad irony I found, and why I responded with a “meh”, because people were going to lock arms and hold a candle light vigil for some LOTR fan and man-child , when really this thread was intended to provoke drama, has invoked drama, and will thrive with said drama for many more pages.
MrStakhanovite wrote:Let me help you out there cowboy,
Liz likes drama, so she decided to post a farewell thread about a controversial poster who has gone out of his way to be a gigantic douche to people like LDST, what better way to get people to say things that are gossip worthy?
After starting said thread, Liz flounces off to NOM-Utopia, where people pretend the LDS Church is gay friendly and pluralistic, so she can link drama thread with an appropriate “LOL” to signal the start of commentary by a virtual parade of crucified messiahs.
The icing on this two layered cake, is now Liz gets to dole out invitations to her clubhouse. It’s similar to MAD banning someone, then continuing the conversation one sided.
The whole thing, from start to finish, is for entertainment, and nothing else. That is the sad irony I found, and why I responded with a “meh”, because people were going to lock arms and hold a candle light vigil for some LOTR fan and man-child , when really this thread was intended to provoke drama, has invoked drama, and will thrive with said drama for many more pages.
stemelbow wrote:Hey Schreech, if ya can't see it on your own, i can't help ya.
schreech wrote:Ah, so what you are saying is that you are talking out your arse (as usual) and can provide no examples of "hate"...Thanks for acting like the momo-tool i have come to expect....
stemelbow wrote:No probs...and thanks for acting like the 12 year old, I have come to expect.
Seriously though, your leaving over there has stirred up far more than his vindictive assaults. Its quite amazing people behave as so many of them do and when called on it they seem to genuinely think they are doing just fine. Its an astounding view of some pretty sad behaviour. its doubly sad it somehow has something to do with the subject of Mormonism. Man, they are, overall, hurting.
liz, on her private board wrote:Hey, Nehor, I just posted this on MDB:
http://www.mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3 ... =1&t=20261
I'm curious as to what the vultures have to say. LOL
schreech wrote:pep! pep!
No probs...and thanks for acting like the blind-mormon-tool that we have all come to expect...see #1 in my sig below...Love ya tons!!! ya insecure/closed-minded douche...hopefully your nose-to-arse posts here will get you the invite, you so desperately need, to the "goddess suite"...