Two steps backwards - Tad R. Callister

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_mikuu
_Emeritus
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:07 am

Re: Two steps backwards - Tad R. Callister

Post by _mikuu »

consiglieri wrote:
I agree it was a regrettable discourse, especially using the old missionary comparison about drawing an infinite number of lines through one point (the Bible) but only being able to draw one line through two points (the Bible and the Book of Mormon).

As if there aren't already tons of different religions using both points.

And as if the Bible doesn't have four gospels in it attesting to the reality of the resurrection.

I actually tend to think the more scriptures we have, the more interpretations are possible.

All the Best!

--Consiglieri


My preteen daughter said "if you place the dots on top of each other you can still have lots of lines." It made me smile. I am glad she is thinking.
_Wisdom Seeker
_Emeritus
Posts: 991
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:55 am

Re: Two steps backwards - Tad R. Callister

Post by _Wisdom Seeker »

Nothing in that talk that cannot be fixed in post production (Ensign). The correlation committee no doubt are going over the already approved talks and making sure the correct message gets put into print.
_Phillip
_Emeritus
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 9:12 pm

Re: Two steps backwards - Tad R. Callister

Post by _Phillip »

Aristotle Smith wrote:My favorite was the absolute double standard that he applies.

Apparently the Book of Mormon is true because...it says good things about Jesus. That's it!

“I therefore, yet not I, but the love of Jesus Christ, entreat you that ye use Christian nourishment only, and abstain from herbage of a different kind; I mean heresy. For those mix up Jesus Christ with their own poison, speaking things which are unworthy of credit, like those who administer a deadly drug in sweet wine, which he who is ignorant of does greedily take, with a fatal pleasure leading to his own death.”

- Epistle of Ignatius, bishop of Antioch, to the Trallians ~107 AD


“They set forth, indeed, the name of Christ Jesus as a sort of lure, but in various ways they introduce the impieties of Simon; and thus they destroy multitudes, wickedly disseminating their own doctrines by the use of a good name, and, through means of its sweetness and beauty, extending to their hearers the bitter and malignant poison of the serpent, the great author of apostasy.”

- Irenaeus, Against Heresies ~180 AD
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: Two steps backwards - Tad R. Callister

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Least favorite talk of the whole conference. Many logical fallacies. Also sets members up for a fall when they find out the Book of Mormon has major issues as far is it being a true history and such. More later as I am on the run. But now I know The Lord of the Rings is scripture because it inspires me to do good and I feel the spirit when I read it.
_consiglieri
_Emeritus
Posts: 6186
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:47 pm

Re: Two steps backwards - Tad R. Callister

Post by _consiglieri »

Jason Bourne wrote: But now I know The Lord of the Rings is scripture because it inspires me to do good and I feel the spirit when I read it.


But does it say nice things about Jesus?
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
_consiglieri
_Emeritus
Posts: 6186
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 10:47 pm

Re: Two steps backwards - Tad R. Callister

Post by _consiglieri »

mikuu wrote:My preteen daughter said "if you place the dots on top of each other you can still have lots of lines." It made me smile. I am glad she is thinking.


Clever girl.
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Two steps backwards - Tad R. Callister

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

This is what a lack of solid seminary education reaps ecclesiastical leaders.
_mms
_Emeritus
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:10 pm

Re: Two steps backwards - Tad R. Callister

Post by _mms »

Perhaps this explains where he is coming from as it pertains to arguments re the Book of Mormon? (from a Callister talk here: http://devotional.byuh.edu/node/76 )

Fifth Principle: Sometimes reason and revelation are in apparent conflict and you must choose which will govern your life.
Each of us at various times in our lives will confront a crossroad—where we must choose either revelation from God or the reason of the world. None will escape. It may come at a time when a loved one is lost, or there are insufficient funds to pay one's tithing, or one feels rejected and lonely. But the conflict will come, not once, but on multiple occasions. It faced Moses as he was trapped between the Red Sea and the fast approaching Egyptian army. No doubt the powers of reason screamed "veer to the left or to the right," but the Spirit whispered, "March direct for the Red Sea." His allegiance to the Spirit saved the Israelite nation.
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Two steps backwards - Tad R. Callister

Post by _Chap »

... It faced Moses as he was trapped between the Red Sea and the fast approaching Egyptian army. No doubt the powers of reason screamed "veer to the left or to the right," but the Spirit whispered, "March direct for the Red Sea."


How crude we humans are! Next time I am undergoing military training, and the sergeant wants me to yell out a fire order loud and clear enough to make sure my platoon hears and understands who the order is for, where the target is and what type of fire to use, while all hell breaks out around them, I shall politely inform him that this is not God's way, and I do not propose to follow his suggestion.

When on the battlefield God has to convey urgent and vital information on which many peoples' lives and (if we believe the Christian myth) the whole future of humanity depends, he whispers. So much more effective and reliable!

No doubt the spirit will also whisper to the sergeant to make sure he takes my explanation in the right spirit.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Lucretia MacEvil
_Emeritus
Posts: 1558
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:01 am

Re: Two steps backwards - Tad R. Callister

Post by _Lucretia MacEvil »

krose wrote:So Tad's great-great grandpa decided that the Book of Mormon could only have been written by God or Satan, then (of course) had to come down on the side of God after reading more. I assume this nugget of wisdom has been passed down through the family and never questioned. I guess it never occurred to anyone that humans can write books on their own


Thanks for the giggle!
The person who is certain and who claims divine warrant for his certainty belongs now to the infancy of our species. Christopher Hitchens

Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. Frater
Post Reply