honorentheos wrote:Stak and Tarski -
Since Ceeboo's OP is based on the question of why the three friends at the party could not seem to agree on what it means to be an atheist I think he is looking for something with more explanatory power.
I would suggest the simple answer is accurate enough just as defining theism is to believe in a God or Gods. Yet that answer tells us very little and once one tries to get into the detail of what it means the similarities between various theistic ideas becomes much more discreet.
Unless Stak has finally sat down as the lion with the lambs at the same table as the neo-atheists, wrapped in brotherly love and common good will?
OK then how about this: The meaning of the word "atheist", like most words, does not have a hard edge. There is some semantic ambiguity. If more definiteness is needed, it will have to come out in the given conversation.
The situation for the word "theist" seems even more fuzzy since, these days, one never quite knows what is meant by "God".
I think we have to live with it and clarify things on a conversation by conversation basis.