Will Challenges Chris Smith to a Formal Public Debate

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: Will Challenges Chris Smith to a Formal Public Debate

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

Droopy wrote:These are the ramblings of a cornered intellectual hack who is functioning from a position of fear, fear of what the really substantive apologetic arguments may make of the sophisticated knit one, pearl two text-critical approach the critics have long taken to the Book of Abraham and which has now been taken to the mat by competent LDS scholars who have begun to beat them at their own game.

College debate clubs may do it as a game. Serious thinkers do not, and you have long ago recused yourself from among that class.


Your right, this idea about debate taken right out of Plato and Aristotle are ramblings of a hack, becasue God knows, Will Schryver's ability to do textual criticism is super scary.

Droopy wrote:
MrStakhanovite wrote:Hey Loran, didn't that happen in the same thread where you claimed to have debated in a formal academic setting, but upon questioning, it turned out that it was just some kind of speech class?


I have no idea what you're talking about, and neither do you. I've never debated in a formal, academic setting, except within academic classes with other students, nor have I ever taken a speech class.

Next time you roll your dice, Stak, take those cheap 3-D glasses off and aim for the floor.


Lucky be a lady tonight:
Droopy wrote:The last time I engaged in a public debate in the academic world, it was on the subject of universal health care. All involved were to take the opposite side of the one they actaually believed.

In preperation, I studied everything I could find on the arguments for socialized medicine, assuming that the salient arguments I found were the actual argumetns leftists would use in any debate, formal or informal on the subject. This, however, assumes that there are clear, succinct and definable arguments on the other side.

(sauce)
Never get out of my sight…
MrStakhanovite wrote:In the academic world? You mean one of your undergrad Poly-Sci courses or a public speaking course in one of Liberal Education requirements for graduation? You make it sound like you are some Policy wonk who got called down from a think tank in D.C. to debate some Professors.

(sauce)
Go ahead and blow of Democrat dice…
MrStakhanovite wrote:
Droopy wrote: You see…Image...intellectual depth…….Image...temperament, or grasp of the subject matter…….Image...debate...Image...pseudo-intellectualImage...Graham...Imageintellectual levelImage...Book of Abraham...



I’m glad you totally smoked that kid in your undergrad class.

(sauce)
Luck be a lady tonight!
Image
Last edited by Guest on Wed Nov 02, 2011 8:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Mattie
_Emeritus
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Will Challenges Chris Smith to a Formal Public Debate

Post by _Mattie »

Rambo wrote:How do you know who Will Schryver is? Have you been to other message boards? You said you have only been here for a short amount of time and you didn't know what we were talking about. But then you know who Will Schryver is. That makes no sense because not to many Mormons know who the hell Will is and they really don't care. Most Mormons don't know what an apologist is. Do you know what an apologist is? Can I ask your background?

I don't know Will from message boards.

This is my first message board.

I know what an apologist is.

You can ask my background.
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Will Challenges Chris Smith to a Formal Public Debate

Post by _Chap »

Mattie wrote: ...
You can ask my background.


Asked.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Mattie
_Emeritus
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Will Challenges Chris Smith to a Formal Public Debate

Post by _Mattie »

Chap wrote:
Mattie wrote: ...
You can ask my background.


Asked.

I grew up in northern California.
_Rambo
_Emeritus
Posts: 1933
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:43 am

Re: Will Challenges Chris Smith to a Formal Public Debate

Post by _Rambo »

Mattie wrote:
Chap wrote:
Asked.

I grew up in northern California.


Did you go on a mission? Are you currently going to church? Are you married with kids? How much do you know about the church? Are you fimiliar with the issues of polygamy, the book of abraham, the first vision, and other stuff?
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Will Challenges Chris Smith to a Formal Public Debate

Post by _Chap »

Mattie wrote:
I don't know Will from message boards.



So how do you know him?
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Mattie
_Emeritus
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Will Challenges Chris Smith to a Formal Public Debate

Post by _Mattie »

Rambo wrote:Did you go on a mission? Are you currently going to church? Are you married with kids? How much do you know about the church? Are you fimiliar with the issues of polygamy, the book of abraham, the first vision, and other stuff?

Why are you so curious about these things? Is this standard procedure? Did I miss the introductory questionnaire?

Are you going to do a credit check too? (Mine is good, as far as I know.)

I did go on a mission.

I do go to church.

I am not married, although I would like to be. Just haven't found Mr. Right yet, I guess.

How much do I know about the church? I don't know. More than some, probably less than others.

I don't know how to describe how "fimiliar" I am with all things you listed. I'm not sure what you mean. I'm not sure why it matters. Again, is this standard procedure around here? It seems weird to me.
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: Will Challenges Chris Smith to a Formal Public Debate

Post by _just me »

Mattie, welcome to the board. Yes, it is pretty standard for questions like that to be asked of newbies to get an idea of where their posts are coming from.

Again, welcome!

I am a non-believing Mormon, mother and wife.
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_Rambo
_Emeritus
Posts: 1933
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 6:43 am

Re: Will Challenges Chris Smith to a Formal Public Debate

Post by _Rambo »

Mattie wrote:

I don't know how to describe how "fimiliar" I am with all things you listed. I'm not sure what you mean. I'm not sure why it matters. Again, is this standard procedure around here? It seems weird to me.


No there is no standard procedure. It's just nice to know peoples background.

Like say if you weren't ever a member I would have to assume you don't know anything about Joseph Smith or the Book of Mormon. Now I know you are a member and you went on a mission so I can assume you know a fair amount about this topic. It just makes it easier to communicate with you.

My background is I am single as well, use to be Mormon but I don't go anymore, went on a mission, my family and good friends are all still Mormon, and I stopped going to church about a year and a half ago.
_gramps
_Emeritus
Posts: 2485
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm

Re: Will Challenges Chris Smith to a Formal Public Debate

Post by _gramps »

Mattie wrote:

I am not married, although I would like to be. Just haven't found Mr. Right yet, I guess.


Hi Mattie, allow me to introduce myself...
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
Post Reply