Droopy wrote:These are the ramblings of a cornered intellectual hack who is functioning from a position of fear, fear of what the really substantive apologetic arguments may make of the sophisticated knit one, pearl two text-critical approach the critics have long taken to the Book of Abraham and which has now been taken to the mat by competent LDS scholars who have begun to beat them at their own game.
College debate clubs may do it as a game. Serious thinkers do not, and you have long ago recused yourself from among that class.
Your right, this idea about debate taken right out of Plato and Aristotle are ramblings of a hack, becasue God knows, Will Schryver's ability to do textual criticism is super scary.
Droopy wrote:MrStakhanovite wrote:Hey Loran, didn't that happen in the same thread where you claimed to have debated in a formal academic setting, but upon questioning, it turned out that it was just some kind of speech class?
I have no idea what you're talking about, and neither do you. I've never debated in a formal, academic setting, except within academic classes with other students, nor have I ever taken a speech class.
Next time you roll your dice, Stak, take those cheap 3-D glasses off and aim for the floor.
Lucky be a lady tonight:
Droopy wrote:The last time I engaged in a public debate in the academic world, it was on the subject of universal health care. All involved were to take the opposite side of the one they actaually believed.
In preperation, I studied everything I could find on the arguments for socialized medicine, assuming that the salient arguments I found were the actual argumetns leftists would use in any debate, formal or informal on the subject. This, however, assumes that there are clear, succinct and definable arguments on the other side.
(sauce)
Never get out of my sight…
MrStakhanovite wrote:In the academic world? You mean one of your undergrad Poly-Sci courses or a public speaking course in one of Liberal Education requirements for graduation? You make it sound like you are some Policy wonk who got called down from a think tank in D.C. to debate some Professors.
(sauce)
Go ahead and blow of Democrat dice…
MrStakhanovite wrote:Droopy wrote: You see…...intellectual depth…….
...temperament, or grasp of the subject matter…….
...debate...
...pseudo-intellectual
...Graham...
intellectual level
...Book of Abraham...
I’m glad you totally smoked that kid in your undergrad class.
(sauce)
Luck be a lady tonight!
