liz3564 wrote:Also, Ceeboo, since you seem to be all-knowing regarding this situation, maybe you can answer this question.
Why didn't whoever leaked the information have the guts to come to me directly?
Lol. What would they have said? "Hey, Liz: Dan Peterson is being his usual self. Could you do something about that?" You invited him and people were amused/irritated with his standard-issue behavior. Dan himself kept saying, again and again, "Liz invited me. If she has a problem, she can let me know."
If they were unhappy about how I was running my board, the logical thing would have been for them to have come to me, and given me an opportunity to fix it.
No one on your board was "unhappy" with the way you were running it. Your assessment of the situation has been wiggety-whack pretty much from day 1, Liz. That's what Ceeboo's trying to tell you: none of this really reflects on you, and it has virtually nothing to do with you personally. No one was out to "get" you. No one was trying to "hurt" you. No one requested that you delete your board--that was all your doing. Heck, I've said multiple times here that I supported your board, and wished that you would have kept it up. Instead of seeing this, you've chosen to view this as some kind of personal attack directed at you, and that's seriously misguided.
If that situation happened here, on this board, I would expect members to go to Shades.
What "situation"? How could an analogous situation ever happen here? It never would. You've blown all of this out of proportion and made it into your own personal Epic Drama, Liz. Just let it go already. Launch a new board, don't invite Dan Peterson, and enjoy life.