bcspace: No official position on same-sex marriage

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Fence Sitter
_Emeritus
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: bcspace: No official position on same-sex marriage

Post by _Fence Sitter »

moksha wrote:I think Joseph Smith appropriately pointed out that by their fruits you shall know them. There are more in the Church everyday. That's biology so deal with it.



by the way, this would equally apply to nuts as well, right?



Does this mean that the 24th of July parade will have a gay pride float now?
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
_schreech
_Emeritus
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: bcspace: No official position on same-sex marriage

Post by _schreech »

Shulem wrote:Jesus, Schreech -- you've got a big testimony!!

Shove it. Oooooohhh yeeeeees.

Paul O


i am rebuilding my "testimony" on the truth that i have been created in elohim's image - your post gave me the warm fuzzies :)
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents
"I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
_schreech
_Emeritus
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: bcspace: No official position on same-sex marriage

Post by _schreech »

.
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents
"I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: bcspace: No official position on same-sex marriage

Post by _moksha »

Fence Sitter wrote:Does this mean that the 24th of July parade will have a gay pride float now?


Yes, but it will go by the code name City of Bountiful.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: bcspace: No official position on same-sex marriage

Post by _Darth J »

There is nothing in The Family: A Proclamation to the World that precludes same-sex marriage.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: bcspace: No official position on same-sex marriage

Post by _Darth J »

Worst case senario, some apostles' and prophets' private (and nondoctrinal) interpretation of other doctrine and scripture regarding same-sex marriage is wrong. No harm, no foul.
_Doctor CamNC4Me
_Emeritus
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 11:02 am

Re: bcspace: No official position on same-sex marriage

Post by _Doctor CamNC4Me »

Sir DarthJ,

It just isn't going to happen. BCSpace lacks the fundamental capacity to understand your words.

V/R
Dr. CM
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.

Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: bcspace: No official position on same-sex marriage

Post by _Darth J »

One clear-cut position is that the folklore about same-sex marriage must never be perpetuated. LDS General Authorities I'm sure, in their own way, are doing the best they know to give shape to the Church's support for Proposition 8, to give context for it, to give even history to it. All I can say is however well intended the explanations are, I think almost all of them are inadequate and/or wrong.

It probably would have been advantageous to say nothing, to say we just don't know, and, as with many religious matters, whatever was being done was done on the basis of faith at this time. But some explanations were given and have been given for a lot of years. At the very least, there should be no effort to perpetuate those efforts to explain why Prop 8 was supported. We simply do not know why that practice, that policy, opposing same-sex marriage was in place.
Post Reply